Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34521422›Full record

ReviewImplementation science : IS2021

Attitude theory and measurement in implementation science: a secondary review of empirical studies and opportunities for advancement.

Jessica Fishman, Catherine Yang, David Mandell

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Implementation science : IS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Updating the core competencies for public health in Canada: Feminist community-based study.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica FishmanPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Floor 3, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Jessica.fishman@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2867-8166
Catherine YangPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Floor 3, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
David MandellPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Floor 3, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Funding

Transforming mental health delivery through behavioral economics and implementation scienceP50MH113840 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BEIDAS, RINAD SARY, BUTTENHEIM, ALISON MEREDITH · 2017 to 2020
$6.6M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH113840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation science studies often express interest in "attitudes," a term borrowed from psychology. In psychology, attitude research has an established methodological and theoretical base, which we briefly summarize here. We then review implementation studies designed to measure attitudes and compare their definitions and methods with those from psychology.

methodsA recent review identified 46 studies empirically examining factors associated with implementation. For each of these studies, we evaluated whether authors included attitudes as a construct of interest, and if so, whether and how the construct was defined, measured, and analyzed.

resultsMost of the articles (29/46 [63%]) mention attitudes as an implementation factor. Six articles include a definition of the construct. Nineteen studies were designed to measure attitudes but lacked clarity in describing how attitudes were measured. Those that explained their measurement approach used methods that differed from one another and from validated methods in social psychology. Few articles described associated analyses or provided results specific to attitudes. Despite the lack of specificity regarding relevant measurement, analysis, and results, the articles often included causal conclusions about the role of attitudes.

conclusionsAttitudes may be an important construct to implementation scientists, but studies to date are ambiguous in their definitions of attitudes and inconsistent in the methods used to measure and analyze attitudes. We discuss how implementation studies can apply psychology's standardized definitions, validated measurement approaches, and causal models that include attitudes. This application of attitude theory and methods could offer implementation research valuable scientific opportunities.

Indexed as

AttitudeImplementation ScienceHumansCausal theoryInstrumentationPredictive modelsPsychology methodsValidated measurement

Identifiers

PMID34521422
PMCPMC8438998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.