ArticleBMC health services research2021
How can we improve patients' access to new drugs under uncertainties? : South Korea's experience with risk sharing arrangements.
Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring trends of cost-effectiveness thresholds in South Korea: systematic review of pharmacoeconomic evaluations since introduction of the positive list system.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Review
- Pharmaco-economic Inequalities in Access to Antifibrotic Treatment for Interstitial Lung Disease in the Asia-Pacific Region.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2025Article
- Improving the Reimbursement Process for New Drugs: A Case Study of a Two-Waiver System in South Korea.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Assessment of Financial Impact of Expanding the Scope of Drug Usage in South Korea.International journal of health policy and management · 2025Article
- Tolerability of Daratumumab Amongst Asian Patients with Plasma Cell Dyscrasias - A Single Centre Experience.Clinical hematology international · 2024Article
- The national budget impact of managed entry agreement strategies match with high-cost drugs to maximise drug cost saving: a study protocol.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024Article
- An Industry Survey on Unmet Needs in South Korea's New Drug Listing System.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2023Article
- The long-term effect of generic price competition on the Hungarian statin market.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Literature Review on Health Emigration in Rare Diseases-A Machine Learning Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Association of exogenous factors with the access to innovative pharmaceutical products in Hungary.PloS one · 2023Article
- From Markup to Value: Global Implications of Iran's Cost-plus Pharmaceutical Pricing for Emerging Markets.Journal of research in pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNew drugs including cancer drugs and orphan drugs are becoming increasingly more expensive. Risk sharing arrangements (RSAs) could manage the risk based on both financial impact and the health outcome of new drugs if reimbursed. To improve patients' access to new drugs under uncertainties, many developed countries have adopted RSAs. In this study, we aimed to understand the effects of RSAs in South Korea on patients' access.
methodsWe reviewed current status of RSA drugs in South Korea. The number of appraisals and time gap between market approval and reimbursement per RSA drug were considered to quantify improvement of patients' access as they showed how rapidly decisions on reimbursement of RSA drugs were derived. Then, we applied a comparative analysis to determine whether the RSA drugs in South Korea were reimbursed in the UK, Italy, and Australia. Most data for this study were obtained from websites of the governmental department/agencies responsible for appraisal of drug reimbursement in each country. And literatures related to RSAs were investigated as well.
resultsThe eligibility for Korean RSAs had two key components - drugs for cancer and rare diseases and not having other alternative treatments. As of the first half of 2019, there were 39 RSA drugs reimbursed in South Korea, the majority of which were financial-based schemes. Refund and expenditure cap were the representative types (89.7%). After introduction of RSAs, the time gap and number of appraisals were decreased. Based on the indications of RSA drugs, the level of drug coverage in South Korea was found lower than Italy, similar to the UK, and higher than Australia.
conclusionsRSAs in South Korea significantly enhanced patients' access to new drugs and led to the alleviation of patients' out-of-pocket expenses. The drug coverage of South Korea had a level comparable to that of other countries. This study provides implications for countries that have a dual mission of containing pharmaceutical expenditure and improving access to new drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.