Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34521408›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

How can we improve patients' access to new drugs under uncertainties? : South Korea's experience with risk sharing arrangements.

Boram Lee, Eun-Young Bae, SeungJin Bae, Hyun-Jin Choi, Kyung-Bok Son, Young-Sil Lee, Suhyun Jang, Tae-Jin Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessment of Financial Impact of Expanding the Scope of Drug Usage in South Korea.International journal of health policy and management · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Industry Survey on Unmet Needs in South Korea's New Drug Listing System.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Literature Review on Health Emigration in Rare Diseases-A Machine Learning Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Boram LeeDepartment of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Eun-Young BaeCollege of Pharmacy, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, South Korea.
SeungJin BaeCollege of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyun-Jin ChoiDepartment of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyung-Bok SonCollege of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Young-Sil LeeDepartment of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Suhyun JangCollege of Pharmacy, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea.
Tae-Jin LeeDepartment of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea. tjlee@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2539-3579
Seoul National University · KREwha Womans University · KRGachon University · KRGyeongsang National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew drugs including cancer drugs and orphan drugs are becoming increasingly more expensive. Risk sharing arrangements (RSAs) could manage the risk based on both financial impact and the health outcome of new drugs if reimbursed. To improve patients' access to new drugs under uncertainties, many developed countries have adopted RSAs. In this study, we aimed to understand the effects of RSAs in South Korea on patients' access.

methodsWe reviewed current status of RSA drugs in South Korea. The number of appraisals and time gap between market approval and reimbursement per RSA drug were considered to quantify improvement of patients' access as they showed how rapidly decisions on reimbursement of RSA drugs were derived. Then, we applied a comparative analysis to determine whether the RSA drugs in South Korea were reimbursed in the UK, Italy, and Australia. Most data for this study were obtained from websites of the governmental department/agencies responsible for appraisal of drug reimbursement in each country. And literatures related to RSAs were investigated as well.

resultsThe eligibility for Korean RSAs had two key components - drugs for cancer and rare diseases and not having other alternative treatments. As of the first half of 2019, there were 39 RSA drugs reimbursed in South Korea, the majority of which were financial-based schemes. Refund and expenditure cap were the representative types (89.7%). After introduction of RSAs, the time gap and number of appraisals were decreased. Based on the indications of RSA drugs, the level of drug coverage in South Korea was found lower than Italy, similar to the UK, and higher than Australia.

conclusionsRSAs in South Korea significantly enhanced patients' access to new drugs and led to the alleviation of patients' out-of-pocket expenses. The drug coverage of South Korea had a level comparable to that of other countries. This study provides implications for countries that have a dual mission of containing pharmaceutical expenditure and improving access to new drugs.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsPharmaceutical PreparationsHumansOrphan Drug ProductionRepublic of KoreaAntineoplastic AgentsPharmaceutical PreparationsAccess to new drugsCost-effectivenessDrug reimbursementEconomic evaluationRisk sharing arrangementSouth Korea

Identifiers

PMID34521408
PMCPMC8442279
OpenAlexW3171635112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.