Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34521406›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Webcam use in German neonatological intensive care units: an interview study on parental expectations and experiences.

Alinda Reimer, Laura Mause, Jan Hoffmann, Pauline Mantell, Johanne Stümpel, Till Dresbach, Nadine Scholten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alinda ReimerUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences, Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Eupener Str. 129, 50933, Cologne, Germany. alinda.reimer@uk-koeln.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1618-8784
Laura MauseUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences, Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Eupener Str. 129, 50933, Cologne, Germany.
Jan HoffmannUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences, Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Eupener Str. 129, 50933, Cologne, Germany.
Pauline MantellUniversity Hospital Cologne, Research Unit Ethics, Universitätsstr. 91, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Johanne StümpelUniversity Hospital Cologne, Research Unit Ethics, Universitätsstr. 91, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Till DresbachDepartment of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Nadine ScholtenUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences, Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Eupener Str. 129, 50933, Cologne, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

Joint Federal Committee's innovations fund (G-BA-Innovationsfonds) 01VSF18037- Neo-CamCare
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo bridge the physical distance between parents and children during a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay, webcams are used in few German NICUs. They allow parents to view their infant even when they cannot be present on the ward. The aim of the study was to explore the factors for and against webcam use that parents with or without webcam use encountered.

methodsGuideline-based, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted in the period from September 2019 to August 2020. Interview transcripts were analysed using a category-based content analysis. The categories were generated in a combined deductive-inductive procedure.

resultsWe interviewed 33 mothers and seven fathers. Parents with webcam experience emphasised positive aspects concerning their webcam use. Factors that increased webcam acceptance included feeling certain about the child's well-being and an increased sense of proximity. Only a few critical voices emerged from parents who had webcam experience, e.g. regarding privacy concerns. Parents who had no experience with webcam use showed ambivalence. On the one hand, they expressed a positive attitude towards the webcam system and acknowledged that webcam use could result in feelings of control. On the other hand, reservations emerged concerning an increase of mental stress or a negative influence on parental visitation behaviour.

conclusionIn addition to the parents' positive experiences with webcam use, results show a need within parents who lacked webcam experience. Despite some criticism, it was evident that webcam use was primarily seen as an opportunity to counteract the negative consequences of separation in the postnatal phase.

trial registrationThe Neo-CamCare study is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register. DRKS-ID: DRKS00017755 . Date of Registration in DRKS: 25-09-2019.

Indexed as

MotivationParentsChildFathersFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleQualitative ResearchNICUParentsVideoVirtual visitationWebcam

Identifiers

PMID34521406
PMCPMC8440115
OpenAlexW3201496232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.