Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34521258›Full record

ReviewPharmacogenomics2021

Engaging pharmacogenomics in pain management and opioid selection.

David R Bright, Natasha Petry, Eric Roath, Tyler Gibb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacogenomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unlocking Performance: Pharmacogenomic Insights for Athletes.Sports medicine international open · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David R BrightDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ferris State University College of Pharmacy, 220 Ferris Dr, Big Rapids, MI 49307, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2674-3705
Natasha PetryDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Health Professions, North Dakota State University, PO Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5089-9286
Eric RoathSpartanNash, 1550 Gezon Parkway, Wyoming, MI 49509, USA.
Tyler GibbDepartment of Medical Ethics, Humanities, & Law, Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, Western Michigan University, 1000 Oakland Drive, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioid misuse and mismanagement has been a public health crisis for several years. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) has been proposed as another tool to enhance opioid selection and optimization, with recent studies demonstrating successful implementation and outcomes. However, broad engagement with PGx for opioid management is presently limited. The purpose of this article is to highlight a series of barriers to PGx implementation within the specific context of opioid management. Areas of advancement needed for more robust pharmacogenomic engagement with opioids will be discussed, including clinical and economic research needs, education and training needs, policy and public health considerations, as well as legal and ethical issues. Continuing efforts to address these issues may help to further operationalize PGx toward improving opioid use.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidHumansOpioid-Related DisordersPainPain ManagementPharmacogeneticsPractice Guidelines as TopicPublic Health PracticeAnalgesics, Opioidopioidspainpain managementpharmacogeneticspharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID34521258
PMCPMC8656342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.