Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34520508›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2021

Which deep learning model can best explain object representations of within-category exemplars?

Dongha Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dongha LeeCognitive Science Research Group, Korea Brain Research Institute, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural network (DNN) models realize human-equivalent performance in tasks such as object recognition. Recent developments in the field have enabled testing the hierarchical similarity of object representation between the human brain and DNNs. However, the representational geometry of object exemplars within a single category using DNNs is unclear. In this study, we investigate which DNN model has the greatest ability to explain invariant within-category object representations by computing the similarity between representational geometries of visual features extracted at the high-level layers of different DNN models. We also test for the invariability of within-category object representations of these models by identifying object exemplars. Our results show that transfer learning models based on ResNet50 best explained both within-category object representation and object identification. These results suggest that the invariability of object representations in deep learning depends not on deepening the neural network but on building a better transfer learning model.

Indexed as

Deep LearningBrainHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPattern Recognition, VisualVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID34520508
PMCPMC8444465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.