Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34520447›Full record

SynthesisJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP

A Systematic Review of Approaches for Continuous Quality Improvement Capacity-Building.

Audrey C Loper, Todd M Jensen, Amanda B Farley, Jenille D Morgan, Allison J Metz

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Audrey C LoperSchool of Social Work (Mss Loper and Farley, Drs Jensen and Metz), Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute (Ms Morgan), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Todd M Jensen
Amanda B Farley
Jenille D Morgan
Allison J Metz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextContinuous quality improvement (CQI) has become prominent in public health settings; yet, little consolidated guidance exists for building CQI capacity of community-based organizations.

objectiveTo synthesize relevant literature to identify guiding principles and core components critical to building the capacity of organizations to adopt and use CQI.

designWe employed a systematic review approach to assess guiding principles and core components for CQI capacity-building as outlined in the literature. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies meeting the following criteria were eligible for review: (1) empirical, peer-reviewed journal article, evaluation study, review, or systematic review; (2) published in 2010 or later; and (3) capacity-building activities were described in enough detail to be replicable. Studies not including human subjects, published in a language other than English, or for which full text was not available were excluded. STUDY SELECTION: The initial return of records included 6557 articles, of which 1455 were duplicates. The research team single-screened titles and abstracts of 5102 studies, resulting in the exclusion of 4842 studies. Two hundred sixty-two studies were double-screened during full-text review, yielding a final sample of 61 studies from which data were extracted.

main outcome measuresOutcome measures of interest were operationalized descriptions of guiding principles and core components of the CQI capacity-building approach.

resultsResults yielded articles from medical education, health care, and public health settings. Findings included guiding principles and core components of CQI capacity-building identified in current practice, as well as infrastructural and contextual elements needed to build CQI capacity.

conclusionsThis consolidation of guiding principles and core components for CQI capacity-building is valuable for public health and related workforces. Despite the uneven distribution of articles from health care, medical education, and public health settings, our findings can be used to guide public health organizations in building CQI capacity in a well-informed, systematic manner.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingQuality ImprovementDelivery of Health CareHumansPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID34520447
PMCPMC8781219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.