Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34520269›Full record

ArticleJournal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A2022

Comparison of Primary Suture and T-Tube Drainage After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Combined with Intraoperative Choledochoscopy in the Treatment of Secondary Common Bile Duct Stones: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Yifeng Yin, Kai He, Xianming Xia

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yifeng YinClinical Medical College, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2739-6477
Kai HeDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Xianming XiaDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNSouthwest Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CholedocholithiasisGallstonesLaparoscopyBilirubinCommon Bile DuctDrainageHumansLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSuturesBilirubincommon bile duct stoneslaparoscopic common bile duct explorationprimary suturesecondary cholecystolithiasisT-tube

Identifiers

PMID34520269
PMCPMC9221159
OpenAlexW3200652822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.