Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34520225›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2021

Role of Voice Therapy in Adherence to Voice Rest After Office-Based Vocal Fold Procedures.

Renee E King, Seth H Dailey, Susan L Thibeault

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Early Insights Into the Role of Personality in Adherence to Voice Rest After Phonomicrosurgery.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Renee E KingDivision of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison.ORCID 0000-0002-6540-3834
Seth H DaileyDivision of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Susan L ThibeaultDivision of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison.ORCID 0000-0002-9046-4356

Funding

Engineering the Vocal Fold MucosaR01DC004336 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Susan Lynn Thibeault · 2000 to 2026
$14.6M
University of Wisconsin Voice Research Training Program (T32)T32DC009401 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Susan Lynn Thibeault · 2009 to 2026
$6.3M
Vocal fold epithelial barrier and proliferation in laryngeal papillomatosisF31DC018184 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KING, RENEE · 2019 to 2021
$73k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC018184NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004336NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC009401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Patients undergoing vocal fold procedures significantly reduce but often do not cease voice use during absolute postprocedure voice rest. We hypothesized that patients who completed preprocedure voice therapy would increase adherence to postprocedure voice rest. Method Eighty-six participants completed this prospective cohort study. Patients scheduled for office-based vocal fold procedures, 1-3 days of absolute postprocedure voice rest, and preprocedure speech-language pathology (SLP) care were recruited. SLP care consisted of either (a) multiple voice therapy sessions, (b) one counseling/therapy session, or (c) voice evaluation only. Participants reported talking and other specific voice behaviors on 100-mm visual analog scales for up to 3 days pre- and postprocedure as well as changes in overall voice use at follow-up at least 1 week postprocedure. Results Talking decreased postprocedure by 63% in the therapy group and 65% in the counseling group, both significantly more than the 35% decrease measured in the evaluation group. There were group differences in talking at baseline but not during voice rest. Coughing and throat clearing were highest in the voice evaluation group and decreased less than talking during voice rest. At follow-up, 84% of participants reported that they completed voice rest for at least as long as recommended and 39.5% reported that they never used their voices during voice rest. Participants estimated a 98% overall reduction in voice use during voice rest at follow-up. Conclusions Voice use before and after vocal fold procedures varies by participation in preprocedure voice therapy. Patients significantly decrease talking during postprocedure voice rest but are not perfectly adherent. Communicative voice use decreases more than noncommunicative voice use during voice rest. Patients may overestimate adherence to voice rest at follow-up. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.16589864.

Indexed as

VoiceVoice DisordersHumansProspective StudiesVocal CordsVoice QualityVoice Training

Identifiers

PMID34520225
PMCPMC9132023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.