Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34520061›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2021

FIGO good practice recommendations on delayed umbilical cord clamping.

Ana Bianchi, Bo Jacobsson, Ben W Mol, FIGO Working Group for Preterm Birth

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06000800 (Timing of Umbilical Cord Clamping in Preterm Neonates), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06000800 nacompletednot on this map

Timing of Umbilical Cord Clamping in Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled4ConditionsCord ClampingArmsGroup B, Group C, Group D, Group A
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. FIGO good practice recommendations on delayed umbilical cord clamping.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Ana BianchiPerinatal Department, Pereira Rossell Hospital Public Health and University Hospital, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Bo JacobssonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ben W MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
FIGO Working Group for Preterm Birth
Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell · UYMonash University · AUUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

March of Dimes
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delayed cord clamping in the first minute in preterm infants born before 34 weeks of gestation improves neonatal hematologic measures and may reduce mortality without increasing any other morbidity. In term-born babies, it also seems to improve both the short- and long-term outcomes and shows favorable scores in fine motor and social domains. However, there is insufficient evidence to show what duration of delay is best. The current evidence supports not clamping the cord before 30 seconds for preterm births. Future trials could compare different lengths of delay. Until then, a period of 30 seconds to 3 minutes seems justified for term-born babies.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematurePremature BirthConstrictionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyTime FactorsUmbilical Corddelayed cord clampingneonatal outcomespreterm deliveryterm delivery

Identifiers

PMID34520061
PMCPMC9290637
OpenAlexW3200487608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.