Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34519968›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2022

Reward learning and working memory: Effects of massed versus spaced training and post-learning delay period.

G Elliott Wimmer, Russell A Poldrack

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Naturalistic reinforcement learning.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Anesthesia Resistant Memories in Drosophila, a Working Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The description-experience gap: a challenge for the neuroeconomics of decision-making under uncertainty.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

G Elliott WimmerMax Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research and the Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK. e.wimmer@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2227-119X
Russell A PoldrackDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Stanford University · USWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Overcoming the persistence of first-learned habits to maintain behavioral changeR01AG041653 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI POLDRACK, RUSSELL A · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroscience research has illuminated the mechanisms supporting learning from reward feedback, demonstrating a critical role for the striatum and midbrain dopamine system. However, in humans, short-term working memory that is dependent on frontal and parietal cortices can also play an important role, particularly in commonly used paradigms in which learning is relatively condensed in time. Given the growing use of reward-based learning tasks in translational studies in computational psychiatry, it is important to understand the extent of the influence of working memory and also how core gradual learning mechanisms can be better isolated. In our experiments, we manipulated the spacing between repetitions along with a post-learning delay preceding a test phase. We found that learning was slower for stimuli repeated after a long delay (spaced-trained) compared to those repeated immediately (massed-trained), likely reflecting the remaining contribution of feedback learning mechanisms when working memory is not available. For massed learning, brief interruptions led to drops in subsequent performance, and individual differences in working memory capacity positively correlated with overall performance. Interestingly, when tested after a delay period but not immediately, relative preferences decayed in the massed condition and increased in the spaced condition. Our results provide additional support for a large role of working memory in reward-based learning in temporally condensed designs. We suggest that spacing training within or between sessions is a promising approach to better isolate and understand mechanisms supporting gradual reward-based learning, with particular importance for understanding potential learning dysfunctions in addiction and psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermRewardCognitionHumansIndividualityDecision-makingHabitReinforcement learningRewardSpacingWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID34519968
PMCPMC8821056
OpenAlexW3199824402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.