Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34519966›Full record

Trial reportMolecular imaging and biology2022

Incremental Impact of [

Florian Szigeti, Gregor Schweighofer-Zwink, Matthias Meissnitzer, Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger, Wolfgang Hitzl, Thomas Kunit, Rosemarie Forstner, Christian Pirich, Mohsen Beheshti

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular imaging and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Frontiers in medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Radiology · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Theranostics Nuclear Medicine in Prostate Cancer.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Florian SzigetiSalzburg University of Applied Sciences, Radiation Technology Degree Program, Salzburg, Austria.
Gregor Schweighofer-ZwinkDivision of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrinology, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Matthias MeissnitzerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Cornelia Hauser-KronbergerDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Wolfgang HitzlResearch Office (Biostatistics), Paracelsus Medical University, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Thomas KunitDepartment of Urology and Andrology, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Rosemarie ForstnerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Christian Pirich *Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrinology, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Mohsen Beheshti *Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrinology, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. m.beheshti@salk.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3918-3812
Paracelsus Medical University · ATFachhochschule Salzburg · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe main objective of this prospective study was to assess the value of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen ([ PROCEDURES: A total of 81 patients (mean age: 64.5 years, baseline mean trigger PSA (tPSA) 15.4 ng/ml, ± 15.9) with biopsy proven PCa (24 intermediate- and 57 high risk) scheduled for RPE and ePLND were enrolled in this prospective study. In 52 patients [

resultsIn the patient cohort who underwent RPE, [

conclusion[

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsGallium RadioisotopesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProspective StudiesProstatectomyGallium Radioisotopes[68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11Multiparametric MRIPET/CTPrimary stagingProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID34519966
PMCPMC8760214
OpenAlexW3200578511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.