Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34519964›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2021

Identification of a Rule to Predict Response to Sarilumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Machine Learning and Clinical Trial Data.

Markus Rehberg, Clemens Giegerich, Amy Praestgaard, Hubert van Hoogstraten, Melitza Iglesias-Rodriguez, Jeffrey R Curtis, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg, Andreas Schwarting, Santos Castañeda, Andrea Rubbert-Roth and 2 more

Erratum issued 4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01061736 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Two-part, Dose Ranging and Confirmatory Study With an Operationally Seamless Design, Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of SAR153191 on Top of Methotrexate (MTX) in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Inadequate Responders to MTX Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2010 to 2013Enrolled1,675ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsSarilumab, Placebo (for sarilumab), Methotrexate, Folic Acid
NCT01709578 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel, Placebo-controlled Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Added to Non-biologic DMARD Therapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Inadequate Responders to or Intolerant of TNF-α Antagonists

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2012 to 2015Enrolled546ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsSarilumab, placebo, hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, sulfasalazine
NCT01768572 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study Assessing The Safety and Tolerability of Sarilumab and Tocilizumab In Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Inadequate Responders to or Intolerant of TNF Antagonists

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2013 to 2014Enrolled202ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmssarilumab SAR153191 (REGN88), tocilizumab, hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, sulfasalazine
NCT02332590 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy Versus Adalimumab Monotherapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2015 to 2020Enrolled369ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsSarilumab, Adalimumab, Placebo (for sarilumab), Placebo (for adalimumab)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Markus RehbergSanofi, Frankfurt, Germany.
Clemens GiegerichSanofi, Frankfurt, Germany.
Amy PraestgaardSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Hubert van HoogstratenSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Melitza Iglesias-RodriguezSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jeffrey R CurtisDivision of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Jacques-Eric GottenbergStrasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Andreas SchwartingAcura Kliniken Rheinland-Pfalz AG, Bad Kreuznach, Germany.
Santos CastañedaRheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-IP and EPID-Future Cátedra, Autónoma University of Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
Andrea Rubbert-RothKantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.
Ernest H S ChoySection of Rheumatology and Translational Research, Division of Infection and Immunity, Arthritis Research UK CREATE Centre and Welsh Arthritis Research Network (WARN), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Tenovus Building, Heath Park Campus, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK. choyeh@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4459-8609
MOBILITY, MONARCH, TARGET, and ASCERTAIN investigators
Sanofi (United States) · USSanofi (Germany) · DECardiff University · GBHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHUniversité de Strasbourg · FRUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn rheumatoid arthritis, time spent using ineffective medications may lead to irreversible disease progression. Despite availability of targeted treatments, only a minority of patients achieve sustained remission, and little evidence exists to direct the choice of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in individual patients. Machine learning was used to identify a rule to predict the response to sarilumab and discriminate between responses to sarilumab versus adalimumab, with a focus on clinically feasible blood biomarkers.

methodsThe decision tree model GUIDE was trained using a data subset from the sarilumab trial with the most biomarker data, MOBILITY, to identify a rule to predict disease activity after sarilumab 200 mg. The training set comprised 18 categorical and 24 continuous baseline variables; some data were omitted from training and used for validation by the algorithm (cross-validation). The rule was tested using full datasets from four trials (MOBILITY, MONARCH, TARGET, and ASCERTAIN), focusing on the recommended sarilumab dose of 200 mg.

resultsIn the training set, the presence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, combined with C-reactive protein > 12.3 mg/l, was identified as the "rule" that predicts American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20) to sarilumab. In testing, the rule reliably predicted response to sarilumab in MOBILITY, MONARCH, and ASCERTAIN for many efficacy parameters (e.g., ACR70 and the 28-joint disease activity score using CRP [DAS28-CRP] remission). The rule applied less to TARGET, which recruited individuals refractory to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. The potential clinical benefit of the rule was highlighted in a clinical scenario based on MONARCH data, which found that increased ACR70 rates could be achieved by treating either rule-positive patients with sarilumab or rule-negative patients with adalimumab.

conclusionsWell-established and clinically feasible blood biomarkers can guide individual treatment choice. Real-world validation of the rule identified in this post hoc analysis is merited. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT01061736, NCT02332590, NCT01709578, NCT01768572.

Indexed as

AdalimumabClinical trialMachine learningPrecision medicineRheumatoid arthritisSarilumab

Identifiers

PMID34519964
PMCPMC8572308
OpenAlexW4206675309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.