Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34519958›Full record

Observational studyReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2022

Resilience, Perceived Stress, and Depressed Mood in Women Under in Vitro Fertilization Treatment.

Carmen Fernandez-Ferrera, David Llaneza-Suarez, Daniel Fernandez-Garcia, Vanesa Castañon, Cristina Llaneza-Suarez, Placido Llaneza

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Measuring Resilience in Women with Endometriosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carmen Fernandez-FerreraUniversidad de Oviedo, Departamento de Cirugía y Especialidades Medico Quirurgicas, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Av. Roma, s/n, 33011, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.
David Llaneza-SuarezFIV4, C/ La Merced 22, 33201, Gijon, Spain.
Daniel Fernandez-GarciaQuirinal Primary Healthcare Centre, C/Fuero de Avilés, 18, 33401, Avilés, Asturias, Spain.
Vanesa CastañonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Av. Roma, s/n, 33011, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.
Cristina Llaneza-SuarezHospital Da Costa Burela, Rafael Vior s/n 27880 Burela, Lugo, Spain.
Placido LlanezaUniversidad de Oviedo, Departamento de Cirugía y Especialidades Medico Quirurgicas, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Av. Roma, s/n, 33011, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain. llaneza@uniovi.es.ORCID 0000-0002-6735-4618
Universidad de Oviedo · ESHospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been suggested that women who display higher resilience levels may have less psychological distress during IVF. The aim of this study was to evaluate how infertile women deal with perceived stress, depressed mood, and sleep disturbances at the first IVF attempt and after one or more negative IVF outcomes depending on their level of resilience. An observational, cross-sectional study was carried out in a sample of 207 infertile women undergoing IVF procedures. The participants completed the short version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the short version of the European Spanish Version of Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), the Center of Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10), and the Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS). The relationship between CD-RISC scores ranked according to percentiles and mean PSS-10 scores revealed that women with strong resilience had lower perceived stress. After splitting the sample according to CD-RISC percentiles, differences were observed only at the first IVF attempt and the observed protective effect of high resilience scores appears to disappear following a negative IVF outcome. Women with high resilience are less likely to suffer from perceived stress or depressed mood during their first IVF attempt, this protective effect appears to be lost after a negative outcome.

Indexed as

Resilience, PsychologicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSpainStress, PsychologicalDepressed moodIn vitro fertilizationPerceived stressResilience

Identifiers

PMID34519958
PMCPMC8863692
OpenAlexW3199768507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.