Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34519898›Full record

Article3D printing in medicine2021

Does vaporized hydrogen peroxide sterilization affect the geometrical properties of anatomic models and guides 3D printed from computed tomography images?

Mauricio Toro, Aura Cardona, Daniel Restrepo, Laura Buitrago

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Correction to Acknowledgement.3D printing in medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mauricio ToroTECHFIT Digital Surgery, Industrias Médicas Sampedro, Carrera 47 N° 100 Sur 40 Centro Industrial Portal del Sur, Bodega 14, variante a Caldas, La Estrella (Medellin), Colombia.
Aura CardonaR&D Department, TECHFIT Digital Surgery, Industrias Médicas Sampedro, La Estrella, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5392-1845
Daniel RestrepoR&D Department, TECHFIT Digital Surgery, Industrias Médicas Sampedro, La Estrella, Colombia.
Laura BuitragoTECHFIT Digital Surgery, Industrias Médicas Sampedro, Carrera 47 N° 100 Sur 40 Centro Industrial Portal del Sur, Bodega 14, variante a Caldas, La Estrella (Medellin), Colombia. laura.buitrago@imsampedro.com.
Hospital Vargas · VE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaterial extrusion is used to 3D print anatomic models and guides. Sterilization is required if a 3D printed part touches the patient during an intervention. Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP) is one method of sterilization. There are four factors to consider when sterilizing an anatomic model or guide: sterility, biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and geometric fidelity. This project focuses on geometric fidelity for material extrusion of one polymer acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) using VHP.

methodsDe-identified computed tomography (CT) image data from 16 patients was segmented using Mimics Innovation Suite (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). Eight patients had maxillary and mandibular defects depicted with the anatomic models, and eight had mandibular defects for the anatomic guides. Anatomic models and guides designed from the surfaces of CT scan reconstruction and segementation were 3D printed in medical-grade acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) material extrusion. The 16 parts underwent low-temperature sterilization with VHP. The dimensional error was estimated after sterilization by comparing scanned images of the 3D printed parts.

resultsThe average of the estimated mean differences between the printed pieces before and after sterilization were - 0,011 ± 0,252 mm (95%CI - 0,011; - 0,010) for the models and 0,003 ± 0,057 mm (95%CI 0,002; 0,003) for the guides. Regarding the dimensional error of the sterilized parts compared to the original design, the estimated mean differences were - 0,082 ± 0,626 mm (95%CI - 0,083; - 0,081) for the models and 0,126 ± 0,205 mm (95%CI 0,126, 0,127) for the guides.

conclusionThis project tested and verified dimensional stability, one of the four prerequisites for introducing vaporized hydrogen peroxide into 3D printing of anatomic models and guides; the 3D printed parts maintained dimensional stability after sterilization.

Indexed as

Computer-aided designDimensional measurement accuracyModels, anatomicPrinting, three-dimensionalSterilization

Identifiers

PMID34519898
PMCPMC8439001
OpenAlexW3199549374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.