Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34519893›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2022

ERAS program adherence-institutionalization, major morbidity and anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery: the iCral2 multicenter prospective study.

Marco Catarci, Giacomo Ruffo, Massimo Giuseppe Viola, Felice Pirozzi, Paolo Delrio, Felice Borghi, Gianluca Garulli, Gianandrea Baldazzi, Pierluigi Marini, Giuseppe Sica and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Circular stapler platform and the risk of anastomotic leakage after elective left colectomy and high anterior resection.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marco CatarciGeneral Surgery Unit, "C. E G. Mazzoni" Hospital, Ascoli Piceno, Italy. marco.catarci@aslroma2.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6338-0114
Giacomo RuffoGeneral Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.
Massimo Giuseppe ViolaGeneral Surgery Unit, Cardinale G. Panico Hospital, Tricase, LE, Italy.
Felice PirozziGeneral Surgery Unit, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Pozzuoli, NA, Italy.
Paolo DelrioColorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS-Italia", Naples, Italy.
Felice BorghiGeneral & Oncologic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
Gianluca GarulliGeneral Surgery Unit, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy.
Gianandrea BaldazziGeneral Surgery Unit, ASST Nord Milano, Sesto San Giovanni, MI, Italy.
Pierluigi MariniGeneral Surgery Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe SicaMinimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Policlinico tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs influence morbidity rates and length of stay after colorectal surgery (CRS), and may also impact major complications and anastomotic leakage rates. A prospective multicenter observational study to investigate the interactions between ERAS program adherence and early outcomes after elective CRS was carried out.

methodsProspective enrolment of patients submitted to elective CRS with anastomosis in 18 months. Adherence to 21 items of ERAS program was measured upon explicit criteria in every case. After univariate analysis, independent predictors of primary endpoints [major morbidity (MM) and anastomotic leakage (AL) rates] were identified through logistic regression analyses including all significant variables, presenting odds ratios (OR).

resultsInstitutional ERAS protocol was declared by 27 out of 38 (71.0%) participating centers. Median overall adherence to ERAS program items was 71.4%. Among 3830 patients included in the study, MM and AL rates were 4.7% and 4.2%, respectively. MM rates were independently influenced by intra- and/or postoperative blood transfusions (OR 7.79, 95% CI 5.46-11.10; p < 0.0001) and standard anesthesia protocol (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96; p = 0.028). AL rates were independently influenced by male gender (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.06-2.07; p = 0.021), intra- and/or postoperative blood transfusions (OR 4.29, 95% CI 2.93-6.50; p < 0.0001) and non-standard resections (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.22; p = 0.049).

conclusionsThis study disclosed wide room for improvement in compliance to several ERAS program items. It failed to detect any significant association between institutionalization and/or adherence rates to ERAS program with primary endpoints. These outcomes were independently influenced by gender, intra- and postoperative blood transfusions, non-standard resections, and standard anesthesia protocol.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryAnastomotic LeakHumansInstitutionalizationLength of StayMaleMorbidityPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesAnastomotic leakageColorectal surgeryERASMajor morbidity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.