Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34519867›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2021

Digital subtraction of temporally sequential mammograms for improved detection and classification of microcalcifications.

Kosmia Loizidou, Galateia Skouroumouni, Costas Pitris, Christos Nikolaou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kosmia LoizidouKIOS Research and Innovation Center of Excellence, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Cyprus, 1 Panepistimiou Avenue, Aglantzia, 2109, Nicosia, Cyprus. cloizi01@ucy.ac.cy.ORCID 0000-0002-0810-4926
Galateia SkouroumouniNicosia General Hospital, 215 Nicosia-Limassol Old Road, Strovolos, 2029, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Costas PitrisKIOS Research and Innovation Center of Excellence, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Cyprus, 1 Panepistimiou Avenue, Aglantzia, 2109, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Christos NikolaouLimassol General Hospital, 1 Nikaias, 4131, Limassol, Cyprus.
University of Cyprus · CYLimassol General Hospital · CYNicosia General Hospital · CY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur aim was to demonstrate that automated detection and classification of breast microcalcifications, according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categorisation, can be improved with the subtraction of sequential mammograms as opposed to using the most recent image only.

methodsOne hundred pairs of mammograms were retrospectively collected from two temporally sequential rounds. Fifty percent of the images included no (BI-RADS 1) or benign (BI-RADS 2) microcalcifications. The remaining exhibited suspicious findings (BI-RADS 4-5) in the recent image. Mammograms cannot be directly subtracted, due to tissue changes over time and breast deformation during mammography. To overcome this challenge, optimised preprocessing, image registration, and postprocessing procedures were developed. Machine learning techniques were employed to eliminate false positives (normal tissue misclassified as microcalcifications) and to classify the true microcalcifications as BI-RADS benign or suspicious. Ninety-six features were extracted and nine classifiers were evaluated with and without temporal subtraction. The performance was assessed by measuring sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) at receiver operator characteristics analysis.

resultsUsing temporal subtraction, the contrast ratio improved ~ 57 times compared to the most recent mammograms, enhancing the detection of the radiologic changes. Classifying as BI-RADS benign versus suspicious microcalcifications, resulted in 90.3% accuracy and 0.87 AUC, compared to 82.7% and 0.81 using just the most recent mammogram (p = 0.003).

conclusionCompared to using the most recent mammogram alone, temporal subtraction is more effective in the microcalcifications detection and classification and may play a role in automated diagnosis systems.

Indexed as

Breast DiseasesCalcinosisHumansMammographyRetrospective StudiesBreast cancerMachine learningMammographyRadiographic image interpretation (computer-assisted)Retrospective studies

Identifiers

PMID34519867
PMCPMC8440760
OpenAlexW3201379879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.