ArticleJAMA network open2021
Trends in the Concentration and Distribution of Health Care Expenditures in the US, 2001-2018.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost concentration and resource-use intensity in high-cost HIV/AIDS hospitalizations: evidence from a tertiary infectious disease hospital cohort in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Decision fatigue in hospital settings: A scoping review.Journal of hospital medicine · 2025Article
- Economics of inpatient diabetic foot ulcer care in a multiethnic Asian population: a retrospective analysis of cost drivers and impact of high-cost users.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Concentration of spending and share of specialty drug spending in Medicare Part D over a 10-year period.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2024Article
- Reasons for hospitalisation and cumulative mortality in people, 75 years or older, at high risk of hospital admission: a prospective study.BMC geriatrics · 2024Observational
- Characteristics of High-Cost Beneficiaries of Prescription Drugs in Kazakhstan: A Cross-Sectional Study of Outpatient Data from 2022.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2024Article
- "Our Job is to be so Temporary": Designing Digital Tools that Meet the Needs of Care Managers and their Patients with Mental Health Concerns.Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction · 2023Article
- Health care costs of cardiovascular disease in China: a machine learning-based cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- High-cost users: drivers of inpatient healthcare expenditure concentration in urban China.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- The influence of cross-regional medical treatment on total medical expenses, medical insurance payments, and out-of-pocket expenses of patients with malignant tumors in Chinese low-income areas.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2022Article
- Financial hardship from purchasing prescription drugs among older adults in the United States before, during, and after the Medicare Part D "Donut Hole": Findings from 1998, 2001, 2015, and 2021.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2022Article
- Does self-medication reduce medical expenditure among the middle-aged and elderly population? A four-wave longitudinal study in China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The concentration of health care expenditures has important implications for managing risk pools, drug benefit design, and care management. Objective: To examine trends in the concentration of health care spending in different population groups and expenditure categories in the US between 2001 and 2018. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study is a cross-sectional analysis of Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (MEPS) collected between 2001 and 2018. The MEPS is a household survey of medical expenditures weighted to represent national estimates in the US. Respondents were a nationally representative sample of the US civilian noninstitutionalized population. Data analysis was performed from December 2020 to February 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome is the concentration of health care expenditures as measured by the cumulative percentage of health expenditure vs percentage of ranked population. This study reports trends in the distribution of populations across 4 concentration curve parameters: top 50% expenditure (high spenders), next 49% expenditure (medium spenders), next 1% expenditure (low spenders), and nonspenders. Results: The mean sample size of the MEPS surveys used in the analysis was 34 539 individuals, and the sample size varied between 30 461 and 39 165 individuals over the years studied. On the basis of data from 30 461 MEPS respondents (15 867 women [52.1%]; mean [SD] age, 38.9 [24.0] years) in 2018, the top 4.6% (95% CI, 4.3%-4.9%) of the US population by spending accounted for 50% of health care expenditures. Although this fraction varied across population groups or expenditure categories, it remained remarkably stable over time with one exception: the concentration of spending on prescription drugs. In 2001, one-half of all expenditures on prescription drugs were concentrated in 6.0% (95% CI, 5.6%-6.4%) of the US population, but by 2018, this proportion had decreased to 2.3% (95% CI, 2.1%-2.5%). This change does not appear to be associated with a change in the overall share of prescription drug expenses, which increased by only a small amount, from 20.4% in 2001 to 24.8% in 2018. Conclusions and Relevance: The overall concentration of health care expenditures remained stable between 2001 and 2018, but these findings suggest that there has been a sharp increase in the concentration of spending on prescription drugs in the US. This coincides with the genericization of many primary care drugs, along with a shift in focus of the biopharmaceutical industry toward high-cost specialty drugs targeted at smaller populations. If this trend continues, it will have implications for the minimum scale of risk-bearing and drug management needed to operate efficiently, as well as the optimal cost-sharing features of insurance products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.