ArticleScience progress
Effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction for children with acute intussusception.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06365333 (Pneumatic Reduction For Intussusception In Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pneumatic Reduction For Intussusception In Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study In An Ultrahigh Volume Center
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic enema reduction for intussusception in children younger than 12 months: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Pooled it
- Air enema reduction versus hydrostatic enema reduction for intussusceptions in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Neonatal and early infant intussusception: a 24-year retrospective review from a tertiary referral center.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- A vision transformer deep learning model for assessing pediatric ileocolic intussusception severity using ultrasound images.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a predictive model for surgical intervention following air enema reduction of pediatric intussusception.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Pneumatic versus liquid enema reduction in the management of pediatric intussusception: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Risk factors of bowel perforation during hydrostatic enema reduction for paediatric intussusception.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- Developing a nomogram for predicting surgical intervention in pediatric intussusception after hydrostatic reduction.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of the new-type ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction for children with acute intussusception.
methodsThe clinical data of 364 children with primary acute intussusception who underwent nonsurgical reduction in our hospital between January 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among the 364 children, 119 formed the hydrostatic reduction group. There were 89 males and 30 females, and the average age of admission was 25.13 ± 1.43 months. Among the pneumatic reduction group of 245 patients, there were 163 males and 82 females. The average age of admission was 22.47 ± 1.52 months. The reduction rate, length of stay, and perforation rate were compared between the two groups.
resultsUnivariate analysis showed that the reduction rate in the hydrostatic group (94.96%) was higher than in the pneumatic group (85.31%) (
conclusionThe new-type ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction has a higher reduction rate in the treatment of acute intussusception in children results in a shortened hospital stay, It is effective, safe, and avoids radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.