Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34519531›Full record

ArticlemSystems2021

Baseline Gut Metagenomic Functional Gene Signature Associated with Variable Weight Loss Responses following a Healthy Lifestyle Intervention in Humans.

Christian Diener, Shizhen Qin, Yong Zhou, Sushmita Patwardhan, Li Tang, Jennifer C Lovejoy, Andrew T Magis, Nathan D Price, Leroy Hood, Sean M Gibbons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effects of dietary fibre on metabolic health and obesity.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christian DienerInstitute for Systems Biologygrid.64212.33, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Shizhen QinInstitute for Systems Biologygrid.64212.33, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Yong ZhouInstitute for Systems Biologygrid.64212.33, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sushmita PatwardhanInstitute for Systems Biologygrid.64212.33, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Li TangInstitute for Systems Biologygrid.64212.33, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jennifer C LovejoyInstitute for Systems Biologygrid.64212.33, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Andrew T MagisInstitute for Systems Biologygrid.64212.33, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Nathan D PriceInstitute for Systems Biologygrid.64212.33, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Leroy HoodInstitute for Systems Biologygrid.64212.33, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sean M GibbonsInstitute for Systems Biologygrid.64212.33, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8724-7916

Funding

Institute for Systems Biology Innovator AwardWashington Research Foundation (WRF) Distinguished Investigator Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent human feeding studies have shown how the baseline taxonomic composition of the gut microbiome can determine responses to weight loss interventions. However, the functional determinants underlying this phenomenon remain unclear. We report a weight loss response analysis on a cohort of 105 individuals selected from a larger population enrolled in a commercial wellness program, which included healthy lifestyle coaching. Each individual in the cohort had baseline blood metabolomics, blood proteomics, clinical labs, dietary questionnaires, stool 16S rRNA gene sequencing data, and follow-up data on weight change. We generated additional targeted proteomics data on obesity-associated proteins in blood before and after intervention, along with baseline stool metagenomic data, for a subset of 25 individuals who showed the most extreme weight change phenotypes. We built regression models to identify baseline blood, stool, and dietary features associated with weight loss, independent of age, sex, and baseline body mass index (BMI). Many features were independently associated with baseline BMI, but few were independently associated with weight loss. Baseline diet was not associated with weight loss, and only one blood analyte was associated with changes in weight. However, 31 baseline stool metagenomic functional features, including complex polysaccharide and protein degradation genes, stress-response genes, respiration-related genes, and cell wall synthesis genes, along with gut bacterial replication rates, were associated with weight loss responses after controlling for age, sex, and baseline BMI. Together, these results provide a set of compelling hypotheses for how commensal gut microbiota influence weight loss outcomes in humans.

Indexed as

amylasediethealthmetabolomemetagenomemicrobiomeobesityproteomereplication rateweight loss

Identifiers

PMID34519531
PMCPMC8547453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.