Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34519140›Full record

Trial reportNursing in critical care2022

Impact of blended learning on manual defibrillator's use: A simulation-based randomized trial.

Johan N Siebert, Alban Glangetas, Marine Grange, Kevin Haddad, Delphine S Courvoisier, Laurence Lacroix

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nursing in critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Johan N SiebertDepartment of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Geneva Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2871-3382
Alban GlangetasDepartment of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Geneva Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marine GrangeDepartment of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Geneva Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kevin HaddadDepartment of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Geneva Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Delphine S CourvoisierQuality of Care Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Laurence LacroixDepartment of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Geneva Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlended learning, defined as the combination of traditional face-to-face instructor-led learning and e-learning course, has never been validated as a teaching method for the effective use of manual defibrillators in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

aimTo evaluate whether paediatric emergency and critical care providers exposed to a blended learning session performed better and recalled more defibrillator skills than those exposed to face-to-face learning only. STUDY

designA two-period prospective, stratified, single-centre, simulation-based, randomized, controlled trial.

methodsRegistered nurses and postgraduate residents from either a paediatric emergency department or an intensive care unit were randomly assigned to a blended learning or face-to-face learning sessions on the recommended use of a manual defibrillator. Participants' adherence to recommendations was assessed by testing defibrillator skills in three consecutive paediatric cardiopulmonary scenarios performed on the day of the training and once again 2 months later. The primary endpoint was the number of errors observed during defibrillation, cardioversion, and transcutaneous pacing at the time of the initial intervention.

resultsFifty participants were randomized to receive the intervention and 51 to the control group. When pooling all three procedures, the median total errors per participant was lower (2 [IQR: 1-4]) in providers exposed to blended learning than in those exposed to face-to-face learning only (3 [IQR: 2-5]; P = .06). The median of total errors per procedure was also lower. However, both training methods appeared insufficient to maintain appropriate skill retention over time as a repetition of procedures 2 months later without any refresher learning session yielded more errors in both groups.

conclusionsLearners exposed to blended learning showed a reduced number in the total amount of errors compared with those exposed to face-to-face learning alone, with waning of skills over time. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Proficiently teaching the use of a manual defibrillator can be performed through blended learning.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementLearningChildClinical CompetenceDefibrillatorsHumansProspective Studiesblended learningdefibrillatoreducationeducational technologyemergency medicinenursingpaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID34519140
PMCPMC9290488
OpenAlexW3201279011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.