Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34518991›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022

Patient Engagement: an Assessment of Canadian Radiotherapy Programs' Current Practices, Perceived Barriers, and Facilitators.

Gabrielle Robin, Erika Brown, Carol-Anne Davis, Louise Bird, Lianne Wilson, Ross Halperin, Michael Brundage, Jennifer Croke, Cody Harper, Meredith Giuliani and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gabrielle RobinDalhousie University, Halifax, NB & NS, Canada. grobin@dal.ca.
Erika BrownCARO Quality and Standards Working Group, Markham, ON, Canada.
Carol-Anne DavisDalhousie University, Halifax, NB & NS, Canada.
Louise BirdCARO Quality and Standards Working Group, Markham, ON, Canada.
Lianne WilsonCARO Quality and Standards Working Group, Markham, ON, Canada.
Ross HalperinCARO Quality and Standards Working Group, Markham, ON, Canada.
Michael BrundageCARO Quality and Standards Working Group, Markham, ON, Canada.
Jennifer CrokeCARO Quality and Standards Working Group, Markham, ON, Canada.
Cody HarperDalhousie University, Halifax, NB & NS, Canada.
Meredith GiulianiCARO Quality and Standards Working Group, Markham, ON, Canada.
CARO and Standards Committee Patient Education/Engagement working group
Amanda CaissieDalhousie University, Halifax, NB & NS, Canada.
Canadian Partnership Against Cancer · CADalhousie University · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CABC Cancer Agency · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient engagement and education have been mandated across Canadian radiation oncology programs (ROP). Guidance documents include the 2014 Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology (CARO) Radiation Therapy Patient Charter, the 2016 Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy (CPQR) Patient Engagement Guidelines (PEG) for Canadian Radiation Treatment Programs, and Accreditation Canada's 2017 refresh of Cancer Care Standards. Since little is known regarding uptake of these guidance statements, Canadian ROP were surveyed to assess current patient engagement and education practices. An e-survey was sent to Canadian ROP (n = 44). The survey focused on awareness and uptake of the CARO Patient Charter, CPQR PEG, and patient education practices. Survey development was guided by these documents and expert consensus, including CARO's Quality and Standards Patient Education/Engagement working group. Many (71%) responding ROP were familiar with the CARO Patient Charter, while 24% reported use. More than half (53%) of ROP were aware of the CPQR PEG, but approximately third (37%) had previously completed a self-audit. Most (88%) ROP view a pan-Canadian, evidence-based approach to educational materials beneficial and feasible (80%), with the majority (89%) willing to share their best practices across the radiotherapy community. Patient engagement and education are nationally mandated and supported by guidance documents. However, gaps have been identified across ROP for awareness and use of available tools, as well as uptake of their processes critical to quality of care. Understanding current practices will inform CPQR/CARO-supported pan-Canadian initiatives to optimize uptake, including development of CPQR Patient Education Guidance for Canadian Radiation Treatment Programs.

Indexed as

Radiation OncologyCanadaHumansPatient ParticipationSurveys and QuestionnairesEducationEngagementPatientsRadiation oncologyResourcesSurvey

Identifiers

PMID34518991
OpenAlexW3199627967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.