Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34518985›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2021

CT pulmonary angiography appropriateness in a single emergency department: does the use of revised Geneva score matter?

Alessandra Mirabile, Nicola Maria Lucarelli, Enza Pia Sollazzo, Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora, Angela Sardaro, Gianmario Mirabile, Filomenamila Lorusso, Vito Racanelli, Nicola Maggialetti, Arnaldo Scardapane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alessandra MirabileInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Bari Medical School "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy. alessandramirabile@libero.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3961-8217
Nicola Maria LucarelliInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Bari Medical School "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Enza Pia SollazzoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Medical School "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Amato Antonio Stabile IanoraInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Bari Medical School "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Angela SardaroInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Bari Medical School "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Gianmario MirabileDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70125, Bari, Italy.
Filomenamila LorussoInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Bari Medical School "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Vito RacanelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Medical School "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Nicola MaggialettiDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, (DSMBNOS), University of Bari Medical School "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Arnaldo ScardapaneInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Bari Medical School "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the percentage of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) procedures that could have been avoided by methodical application of the Revised Geneva Score (RGS) coupled with age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs rather than only clinical judgment in Emergency Department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIAL AND

methodsBetween November 2019 and May 2020, 437 patients with suspected PE based on symptoms and D-dimer test were included in this study. All patients underwent to CTPA. For each patient, we retrospectively calculated the age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs and the RGS in the original version. Finally, CT images were retrospectively reviewed, and the presence of PE was recorded.

resultsIn total, 43 (9.84%) CTPA could have been avoided by use of RGS coupled with age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs. Prevalence of PE was 14.87%. From the analysis of 43 inappropriate CTPA, 24 (55.81%) of patients did not show any thoracic signs, two (4.65%) of patients had PE, and the remaining patients had alternative thoracic findings.

conclusionThe study showed good prevalence of PE diagnoses in our department using only physician assessment, although 9.84% CTPA could have been avoided by methodical application of RGS coupled with age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalAgedAge FactorsComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHumansLungMalePulmonary EmbolismReproducibility of ResultsUnnecessary ProceduresAge-adjusted D-dimer cut-offsComputed tomography pulmonary angiographyPulmonary embolismRevised Geneva score

Identifiers

PMID34518985
PMCPMC8702417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.