ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2021
Evaluation of a streamlined sentinel lymph-node imaging protocol in early-stage oral cancer.
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSentinel lymph-node (SLN) mapping for early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is comprehensive and consequently time-consuming and costly. This study evaluated the clinical value of several SLN imaging components and analyzed the accuracy for SLN identification using a streamlined SLN imaging protocol in early-stage OSCC. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective within-patient evaluation study compared both number and localization of identified SLNs between the conventional SLN imaging protocol and a streamlined imaging protocol (dynamic lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) for 10 min directly post-injection and SPECT-CT at ~ 2 h post-injection). LSG and SPECT-CT images of 77 early-stage OSCC patients, scheduled for SLN biopsy, were evaluated by three observers. Identified SLNs using either protocol were related to histopathological assessment of harvested SLNs, complementary neck dissection specimens and follow-up status.
resultsA total of 200 SLNs were identified using the streamlined protocol, and 12 additional SLNs (n = 212) were identified with the conventional protocol in 10 patients. Of those, 9/12 were identified on early static LSG and 3/12 on late static LSG. None of the additionally identified SLNs contained metastases; none of those in whom additional SLNs were identified developed regional recurrence during follow-up. Only inferior alveolar process carcinoma showed a higher rate of additionally identified SLNs with the conventional protocol (p = 0.006).
conclusionEarly dynamic LSG can be reduced to 10 min. Late static LSG may be omitted, except in those with a history of oncological neck treatment or with OSCC featuring slow lymphatic drainage. Early static LSG appeared to be contributory in most OSCC subsites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.