Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34518950›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2022

A randomized controlled trial of stapled versus ultrasonic transection in distal pancreatectomy.

Luca Landoni, Matteo De Pastena, Martina Fontana, Giuseppe Malleo, Alessandro Esposito, Luca Casetti, Giovanni Marchegiani, Massimiliano Tuveri, Salvatore Paiella, Antonio Pea and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. New method of remnant closure during distal pancreatectomy.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luca Landoni *Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Matteo De Pastena *Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Martina FontanaUnit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Giuseppe MalleoUnit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Alessandro EspositoUnit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Luca CasettiUnit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Giovanni MarchegianiUnit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Massimiliano TuveriUnit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Salvatore PaiellaUnit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Antonio PeaUnit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Marco RameraUnit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Alex BorinUnit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Alessandro GiardinoUnit of HPB Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Isabella FrigerioUnit of HPB Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Roberto GirelliUnit of HPB Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Claudio BassiUnit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Giovanni Butturini *Unit of HPB Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Roberto Salvia *Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy. roberto.salvia@univr.it.
University of Verona · ITCasa di Cura Villa Garda · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pancreatic transection method during distal pancreatectomy is thought to influence postoperative fistula rates. Yet, the optimal technique for minimizing fistula occurrence is still unclear. The present randomized controlled trial compared stapled versus ultrasonic transection in elective distal pancreatectomy.

methodsPatients undergoing distal pancreatectomy from July 2018 to July 2020 at two high-volume institutions were considered for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were contiguous organ resection and a parenchymal thickness > 17 mm on intraoperative ultrasound. Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to stapled transection (Endo GIA Reinforced Reload with Tri-Staple Technology®) or ultrasonic transection (Harmonic Focus® + or Harmonic Ace® + shears). The primary endpoint was postoperative pancreatic fistula. Secondary endpoints included overall complications, abdominal collections, and length of hospital stay.

resultsOverall, 72 patients were randomized in the stapled transection arm and 73 patients in the ultrasonic transection arm. Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 23 patients (16%), with a comparable incidence between groups (12% in stapled transection versus 19% in ultrasonic dissection arm, p = 0.191). Overall complications did not differ substantially (35% in stapled transection versus 44% in ultrasonic transection arm, p = 0.170). There was an increased incidence of abdominal collections in the ultrasonic dissection group (32% versus 14%, p = 0.009), yet the need for percutaneous drain did not differ between randomization arms (p = 0.169). The median length of stay was 8 days in both groups (p = 0.880). Intraoperative blood transfusion was the only factor independently associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula on logistic regression analysis (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.2-20.0, p = 0.032).

conclusionThe present randomized controlled trial of stapled versus ultrasonic transection in elective distal pancreatectomy demonstrated no significant difference in postoperative pancreatic fistula rates and no substantial clinical impact on other secondary endpoints.

Indexed as

PancreatectomyPancreatic FistulaHumansPancreasPostoperative ComplicationsSurgical StaplingUltrasonicsDistal pancreatectomyPancreatic fistulaStaplerUltrasonic dissection

Identifiers

PMID34518950
PMCPMC9085691
OpenAlexW3200785902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.