Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34518824›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2021

The next pandemic: impact of COVID-19 in mental healthcare assistance in a nationwide epidemiological study.

Felipe Ornell, Wyllians Vendramini Borelli, Daniela Benzano, Jaqueline Bohrer Schuch, Helena Ferreira Moura, Anne Orgler Sordi, Felix Henrique Paim Kessler, Juliana Nichterwitz Scherer, Lisia von Diemen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Call to Action on Assessing and Mitigating Bias in Artificial Intelligence Applications for Mental Health.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Felipe OrnellHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Center for Drug and Alcohol Research, Ramiro Barcelos Street, 2350, Santa Cecilia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Wyllians Vendramini BorelliHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Neurology Service, Ramiro Barcelos Street, 2350, Santa Cecilia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Daniela BenzanoHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Center for Drug and Alcohol Research, Ramiro Barcelos Street, 2350, Santa Cecilia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Jaqueline Bohrer SchuchHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Center for Drug and Alcohol Research, Ramiro Barcelos Street, 2350, Santa Cecilia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Helena Ferreira MouraHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Center for Drug and Alcohol Research, Ramiro Barcelos Street, 2350, Santa Cecilia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Anne Orgler SordiHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Center for Drug and Alcohol Research, Ramiro Barcelos Street, 2350, Santa Cecilia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Felix Henrique Paim KesslerHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Center for Drug and Alcohol Research, Ramiro Barcelos Street, 2350, Santa Cecilia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Juliana Nichterwitz SchererHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Center for Drug and Alcohol Research, Ramiro Barcelos Street, 2350, Santa Cecilia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Lisia von DiemenHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Center for Drug and Alcohol Research, Ramiro Barcelos Street, 2350, Santa Cecilia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have reported the worsening of psychiatric symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, few studies have evaluated the impact on the access to mental health services during COVID-19. Our aim was to analyze temporal trends and prediction of appointments held in Brazil's public health system, to compare the observed and expected number of mental healthcare appointments during the COVID-19 pandemics.

methodsAn ecological time-series study was performed, analyzing mental health appointments before and during the pandemic (from 2016 and 2020) from the Brazilian governmental database. The structural break in the data series was assessed using the Chow test, with the break considered in March 2020. Bayesian structural time-series models were used to estimate current average appointments and the predicted expectation if there was no pandemic.

findingsCompared to the expected, between March and August 2020 about 28% less outpatient appointments in mental health were observed, totaling 471,448 individuals with suspended assistance. Group appointments and psychiatric hospitalizations were also severely impacted by the pandemic (decreased of 68% and 33%, respectively). On the other hand, mental health emergency consultations and home care increased during this period (36% and 52%, respectively).

interpretationOur findings demonstrate a dramatic change in mental health assistance during the COVID-19 pandemic, which corroborates a recent WHO survey. This phenomenon can aggravate the mental health crisis and generate a parallel pandemic that may last for a longer time than the COVID-19 pandemic.

fundingThis study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.

Indexed as

AppointmentsCovid-19Mental healthPandemicPsychiatric hospitalizationPublic health systemSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34518824
PMCPMC8427141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.