ArticleMedical science educator2021
An Analysis of Health Science Students' Preparedness and Perception of Interactive Virtual Laboratory Simulation.
Article in Medical science educator, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Teaching third-year students MALDI-TOF using a combination of online interactive simulation and face-to-face practical inquiry.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026Article
- Experiences and perceptions of students in occupational therapy regarding the use of desktop virtual environments-based simulation: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Implementation of LABSTER virtual lab in immunology for innovative teaching and improved learning in veterinary degree.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- A 3-D interactive microbiology laboratory via virtual reality for enhancing practical skills.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Meta-synthesis on Technology-Based Learning Among Healthcare Students in Southeast Asia.Medical science educator · 2022Article
- Google Colab and Virtual Simulations: Practical e-Learning Tools to Support the Teaching of Thermodynamics and to Introduce Coding to Students.ACS omega · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The achievement of learning goals via laboratory practical depends on both extrinsic and intrinsic factors. They could be limited by laboratory time, incurred cost, safety, self-efficacy, inadequate prior preparation by learners, and different learning styles. Hence, virtual laboratory simulation (vLAB) may be an appropriate e-learning tool to overcome these restrictions. In this study, student's perception of the usefulness of vLAB was determined by using deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) gel electrophoresis and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as case examples. The perception of Year 2 and 3 health science undergraduate students' (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.