ArticleJournal of Raman spectroscopy : JRS2021
Diagnosing COVID-19 in human sera with detected immunoglobulins IgM and IgG by means of Raman spectroscopy.
Article in Journal of Raman spectroscopy : JRS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combining label-free Raman spectroscopy with machine learning to monitor COVID-19 disease from acute infection to recovery.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Combining label-free Raman spectroscopy and machine learning to identify early biomarkers of COVID-19 disease severity and mortality.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Detection of Respiratory Disease Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering and Multivariate Analysis of Human Serum.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Raman-Based Techniques in Medical Applications for Diagnostic Tasks: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Diagnosing COVID-19 in nasopharyngeal secretion through Raman spectroscopy: a feasibility study.Lasers in medical science · 2023Article
- Raman spectroscopy for viral diagnostics.Biophysical reviews · 2023Review
- Current trends in COVID-19 diagnosis and its new variants in physiological fluids: Surface antigens, antibodies, nucleic acids, and RNA sequencing.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2022Review
- Spectroscopic methods for COVID-19 detection and early diagnosis.Virology journal · 2022Review
- Diagnosing COVID-19 in human sera with detected immunoglobulins IgM and IgG by means of Raman spectroscopy.Journal of Raman spectroscopy : JRS · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The severe COVID-19 pandemic requires the development of novel, rapid, accurate, and label-free techniques that facilitate the detection and discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects. Raman spectroscopy has been used to diagnose COVID-19 in serum samples of suspected patients without clinical symptoms of COVID-19 but presented positive immunoglobulins M and G (IgM and IgG) assays versus Control (negative IgM and IgG). A dispersive Raman spectrometer (830 nm, 350 mW) was employed, and triplicate spectra were obtained. A total of 278 spectra were used from 94 serum samples (54 Control and 40 COVID-19). The main spectral differences between the positive IgM and IgG versus Control, evaluated by principal component analysis (PCA), were features assigned to proteins including albumin (lower in the group COVID-19 and in the group IgM/IgG and IgG positive) and features assigned to lipids, phospholipids, and carotenoids (higher the group COVID-19 and in the group IgM/IgG positive). Features referred to nucleic acids, tryptophan, and immunoglobulins were also seen (higher the group COVID-19). A discriminant model based on partial least squares regression (PLS-DA) found sensitivity of 84.0%, specificity of 95.0%, and accuracy of 90.3% for discriminating positive Ig groups versus Control. When considering individual Ig group versus Control, it was found sensitivity of 77.3%, specificity of 97.5%, and accuracy of 88.8%. The higher classification error was found for the IgM group (no success classification). Raman spectroscopy may become a technique of choice for rapid serological evaluation aiming COVID-19 diagnosis, mainly detecting the presence of IgM/IgG and IgG after COVID-19 infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.