Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34518709›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of social psychology2021

Are COVID-19 conspiracies a threat to public health? Psychological characteristics and health protective behaviours of believers.

Marie Juanchich, Miroslav Sirota, Daniel Jolles, Lilith A Whiley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of social psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effectiveness of communications in enhancing adherence to public health behavioural interventions: a COVID-19 evidence review.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ambiguity and unintended inferences about risk messages for COVID-19.Journal of experimental psychology. Applied · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marie JuanchichDepartment of Psychology University of Essex Colchester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-9529
Miroslav SirotaDepartment of Psychology University of Essex Colchester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2117-9532
Daniel JollesDepartment of Psychology University of Essex Colchester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1277-0793
Lilith A WhileyDepartment of Organizational Psychology Birkbeck University of London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9605-4534

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested the link between COVID-19 conspiracy theories and health protective behaviours in three studies: one at the onset of the pandemic in the United Kingdom (UK), a second just before the first national lockdown, and a third during that lockdown (

Indexed as

conspiracy theoryCOVID‐19fake‐newshealth protective behaviourspandemic

Identifiers

PMID34518709
PMCPMC8426881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.