Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34518686›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2022

A guide to machine learning for biologists.

Joe G Greener, Shaun M Kandathil, Lewis Moffat, David T Jones

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,028 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,028citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,028 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Identification of novel lncRNAs potentially associated with diabetic retinopathy based on machine learning prediction.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Hearing and Cognitive Function in Aged Adults: A Machine Learning and Mediation Analysis of NHANES.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

968 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joe G Greener *Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5154-1929
Shaun M Kandathil *Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2671-2140
Lewis MoffatDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.
David T JonesDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK. d.t.jones@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8626-3765

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expanding scale and inherent complexity of biological data have encouraged a growing use of machine learning in biology to build informative and predictive models of the underlying biological processes. All machine learning techniques fit models to data; however, the specific methods are quite varied and can at first glance seem bewildering. In this Review, we aim to provide readers with a gentle introduction to a few key machine learning techniques, including the most recently developed and widely used techniques involving deep neural networks. We describe how different techniques may be suited to specific types of biological data, and also discuss some best practices and points to consider when one is embarking on experiments involving machine learning. Some emerging directions in machine learning methodology are also discussed.

Indexed as

BiologyMachine LearningAnimalsDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.