Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34518669›Full record

ReviewNature plants2021

Precise plant genome editing using base editors and prime editors.

Kutubuddin A Molla, Simon Sretenovic, Kailash C Bansal, Yiping Qi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature plants, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed
23.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 368 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome Editing Approaches in Flax (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kutubuddin A MollaCrop Improvement Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, India. kutubuddin.molla@icar.gov.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9897-7906
Simon SretenovicDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3080-5104
Kailash C BansalThe Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Centre for Tropical Agriculture, Asia-India, New Delhi, India.
Yiping QiDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. yiping@umd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9556-6706
Central Rice Research Institute · INUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of CRISPR-Cas systems has sparked a genome editing revolution in plant genetics and breeding. These sequence-specific RNA-guided nucleases can induce DNA double-stranded breaks, resulting in mutations by imprecise non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair or precise DNA sequence replacement by homology-directed repair (HDR). However, HDR is highly inefficient in many plant species, which has greatly limited precise genome editing in plants. To fill the vital gap in precision editing, base editing and prime editing technologies have recently been developed and demonstrated in numerous plant species. These technologies, which are mainly based on Cas9 nickases, can introduce precise changes into the target genome at a single-base resolution. This Review provides a timely overview of the current status of base editors and prime editors in plants, covering both technological developments and biological applications.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Crops, AgriculturalGene EditingPlant BreedingCRISPR-Associated Protein 9

Identifiers

PMID34518669
OpenAlexW3201528655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.