Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34518631›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2022

Sweat-gland carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (SCAND): a clinicopathologic study of 13 cases with genetic analysis.

Keisuke Goto, Yoji Kukita, Keiichiro Honma, Nobuyuki Ohike, Takaya Komori, Yoshihiro Ishida, Misawo Ishikawa, Takashi Nakatsuka, Soichi Fumita, Koichi Nakagawa and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Keisuke GotoDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan. goto.keisuke@icloud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4165-1809
Yoji KukitaLaboratory of Genomic Pathology, Research Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3523-2816
Keiichiro HonmaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5193-5891
Nobuyuki OhikeDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Sunto, Japan.
Takaya KomoriDepartment of Dermatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshihiro IshidaDepartment of Dermatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6210-5903
Misawo IshikawaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kainan Hospital, Yatomi, Japan.
Takashi NakatsukaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, JR Tokyo General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Soichi FumitaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0253-0681
Koichi NakagawaDepartment of Dermatology, Saiseikai Tondabayashi Hospital, Tondabayashi, Japan.
Aya OkabayashiDepartment of Dermatology, Izumi City General Hospital, Izumi, Japan.
Yoshifumi IwahashiDepartment of Human Pathology and Diagnostic Pathology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Tomoyuki TaninoDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Police Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Keisuke KikuchiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Obihiro Kosei Hospital, Obihiro, Japan.
Yoshie KawaharaDepartment of Dermatology, Keiyu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Tsunekazu HishimaDepartment of Pathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0584-7932
Jiro UeharaDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6656-8905
Takuma OishiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Sunto, Japan.
Taiki IseiDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka International Cancer Institute · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JPKyoto University · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPIzumi City General Hospital · JPJR Tokyo General Hospital · JPkeiyu Hospital · JPKinan Hospital · JPKindai University · JPObihiro Kosei General Hospital · JPTokyo Metropolitan Police Hospital · JPWakayama Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin (LGNECS) was proposed in 2017 as a new primary cutaneous neoplasm with neuroendocrine differentiation; however, it is not yet well known due to its rarity. Herein, we perform a detailed clinicopathologic analysis of 13 cases as well as panel DNA sequencing in three cases. The study included 12 males and 1 female with a median age of 71 (43-85) years. All lesions occurred on the ventral trunk. The mean tumor size was 2.2 (0.8-11.0) cm. The histopathology resembled that of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in other organs, but intraepidermal pagetoid spreading was seen in 8 (61.5%) cases and stromal mucin deposits in 4 (30.8%). Immunoreactivity for CK7, CK19, EMA, BerEP4, CEA, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, INSM1, GCDFP15, GATA3, ER, and bcl-2 were present in varying degrees in all tested cases. PTEN c.165-1G>A splice site mutation was detected by panel sequencing in one case, and GATA3 P409fs*99 and SETD2 R1708fs*4 in another case. Lymph node metastasis was seen significantly in cases with tumor size >2.0 cm [8/8 (100%) vs. 1/5 (20%)]. All three cases with size >3.0 cm were in unresectable advanced-stage [3/3 (100%) vs. 1/10 (10%)], and two of the three patients succumbed to the disease. The two cases of death revealed mild nuclear atypia (mitosis: 1/10 HPFs) and moderate nuclear atypia (2/10 HPFs). Thus, tumor size would be a better prognostic factor than nuclear atypia, mitotic count, and Ki67 index, unlike in NETs. These clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features would represent the characteristics as skin adnexal tumors with apocrine/eccrine differentiation rather than NETs; therefore, we rename it as sweat-gland carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (SCAND).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinomaCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedSweat Gland Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID34518631
OpenAlexW3199699180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.