Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34518619›Full record

ReviewJournal of human hypertension2022

Ambulatory monitoring of central arterial pressure, wave reflections, and arterial stiffness in patients at cardiovascular risk.

Stefano Omboni, Ayana Arystan, Bela Benczur

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of human hypertension, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02577835 (International Registry for Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness Telemonitoring), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02577835 completednot on this map

International Registry for Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness Telemonitoring

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorItalian Institute of TelemedicineRan2015 to 2022Enrolled2,000ConditionsHypertensionArmsAmbulatory blood pressure monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Research progress in central aortic pressure estimation algorithms].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefano OmboniClinical Research Unit, Italian Institute of Telemedicine, Varese, Italy. stefano.omboni@iitelemed.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7124-2096
Ayana ArystanDepartment of Functional Diagnostics, Medical Center Hospital of President's Affairs Administration of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Nu-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Bela BenczurFirst Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology/Nephrology), Balassa Janos County Hospital, Szekszard, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2628-8781
Sechenov University · RUUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reviews current 24 h ambulatory noninvasive technologies for pulse wave analysis (PWA) providing central arterial pressure, pulse wave velocity, and augmentation index and the scientific evidence supporting their use in the clinical management of patients with arterial hypertension or at risk for cardiovascular complications.The most outstanding value of these techniques lies in the fact that they are user-friendly, mostly operator independent, and enable the evaluation of vascular function during daily-life conditions, allowing to obtain repeated measurements in different out-of-office circumstances, less artificial than those of the laboratory or doctor's office.Studies performed so far suggest that 24 h PWA may represent a potentially promising tool for evaluating vascular function, structure, and damage in daily-life conditions and promoting early screening in subjects at risk. The current evidence in favor of such an approach in the clinical practice is still limited and does not recommend its routine use. In particular, at the moment, there is a shortage of long-term prognostic studies able to support the predictive value of 24 h PWA. Finally, the accuracy of the measures is strongly dependent on the type of technology and device employed with lack of interoperability among the devices that deeply affects comparability of results among studies using different technologies. It is thus mandatory in the near future to promote proper validation studies, for instance using the ARTERY protocol, and to plan well-designed long-term longitudinal studies that may prove the accuracy and high predictive value of PWA in ambulatory conditions.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesVascular StiffnessArterial PressureBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMonitoring, AmbulatoryPulse Wave AnalysisRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34518619
OpenAlexW3199735041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.