Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34518584›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

ROV assessment of mesophotic fish and associated habitats across the continental shelf of the Amathole region.

Rio E Button, Denham Parker, Vivienne Coetzee, Toufiek Samaai, Ryan M Palmer, Kerry Sink, Sven E Kerwath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rio E ButtonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa. riobutton@gmail.com.
Denham ParkerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa.
Vivienne CoetzeeDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa.
Toufiek SamaaiDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa.
Ryan M PalmerSouth African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Somerset Street, Makhanda, 6139, South Africa.
Kerry SinkSouth African National Biodiversity Institute, Rhodes Drive, Newlands, 7700, South Africa.
Sven E KerwathDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa.
University of Cape Town · ZANelson Mandela University · ZASouth African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity · ZAUniversity of the Western Cape · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how fish associate with habitats across marine landscapes is crucial to developing effective marine spatial planning (MSP) in an expanding and diversifying ocean economy. Globally, anthropogenic pressures impact the barely understood temperate mesophotic ecosystems and South Africa's remote Amathole shelf is no exception. The Kei and East London region encompass three coastal marine protected areas (MPAs), two of which were recently extended to the shelf-edge. The strong Agulhas current (exceeding 3 m/s), which runs along the narrow shelf exacerbates sampling challenges. For the first time, a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) surveyed fish and their associated habitats across the shelf. Results indicated fish assemblages differed between the two principle sampling areas, and across the shelf. The number of distinct fish assemblages was higher inshore and on the shelf-edge, relative to the mid-shelf. However, the mid-shelf had the highest species richness. Unique visuals of rare Rhinobatos ocellatus (Speckled guitarfish) and shoaling Polyprion americanus (wreckfish) were collected. Visual evidence of rhodolith beds, deep-water lace corals and critically endangered endemic seabreams were ecologically important observations. The ROV enabled in situ sampling without damaging sensitive habitats or extracting fish. This study provided information that supported the Amathole MPA expansions, which extended protection from the coast to beyond the shelf-edge and will guide their management. The data gathered provides baseline information for future benthopelagic fish and habitat monitoring in these new MPAs.

Identifiers

PMID34518584
PMCPMC8437978
OpenAlexW3199237597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.