Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34518276›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

SYMptom monitoring with Patient-Reported Outcomes using a web application among patients with Lung cancer in the Netherlands (SYMPRO-Lung): study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial.

Nicole E Billingy, Vashti N M F Tromp, Evalien Veldhuijzen, Jose Belderbos, Neil K Aaronson, Esther Feldman, Rianne Hoek, Harm-Jan Bogaard, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Lonneke van de Poll-Franse and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Digital symptom monitoring in cancer care: an exploratory evaluation of low uptake and engagement.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patient-perceived barriers and facilitators for risk-stratified follow-up care in lung cancer: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. mHealth for Medication and Side Effect Monitoring: Patients' Attitudes Toward Smart Devices for Managing Oral Chemotherapy During Lung Cancer Treatment.International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare : [proceedings]. International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole E Billingy *Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands n.billingy@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-3590-4961
Vashti N M F Tromp *Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6086-0668
Evalien Veldhuijzen *Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Jose BelderbosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Neil K AaronsonDivision of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Esther FeldmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Rianne HoekDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Harm-Jan BogaardDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Bregje D Onwuteaka-PhilipsenDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Lonneke van de Poll-FranseDivision of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline G HugtenburgDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Corina J G van den Hurk *Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands.
Annemarie Becker-Commissaris *Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Iris Walraven *Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Cancer Center Amsterdam · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLTilburg University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLung cancer and its treatment cause a wide range of symptoms impacting the patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) to monitor symptoms during and after cancer treatment has been shown not only to improve symptom management but also to improve HRQoL and overall survival (OS). Collectively, these results favour implementation of PRO-symptom monitoring in daily clinical care. However, these promising outcomes have been obtained under trial conditions in which patients were selected based on stringent inclusion criteria, and in countries with a dissimilar healthcare system than in the Netherlands.The primary aim of the SYMptom monitoring with Patient-Reported Outcomes using a web application among patients with Lung cancer in the Netherlands (SYMPRO-Lung) study is to evaluate the effect of PRO-symptom monitoring during and after lung cancer treatment on HRQoL in daily clinical practice. Secondary objectives include assessing the effect of PRO-symptom monitoring on progression-free survival, OS, the incidence and grade of PRO symptoms, medication adherence, implementation fidelity and cost-effectiveness. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The SYMPRO-Lung study is a prospective, multicentre trial with a stepped wedge cluster randomised design. Study participants (n=292 intervention, n=292 controls) include patients with lung cancer (stages I-IV) starting treatment with surgery, systemic treatment, targeted treatment and/or radiotherapy.Every participating centre will consecutively switch from the control period to the intervention period, in which patients report their symptoms weekly via an online tool. In the intervention group, we evaluate two alert approaches: the active and reactive approach. If the symptoms exceed a predefined threshold, an alert is sent to the healthcare provider (active approach) or to the patient (reactive approach). Both the control and intervention group complete HRQoL questionnaires at 4 time points: at baseline, 15 weeks, 6 months and 1-year post treatment). Differences in HRQoL between the groups will be compared using linear mixed modelling analyses, accounting for within-centre clustering, potential time effects and confounding. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board and the Medical Ethics Committee of the Amsterdam UMC (under number NL 68440.029.18) and the institutional review boards of the participating study sites. The dissemination of the results will be conducted through publication in peer-reviewed journals and through scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Trial register identifier: Netherlands Trial register Trial NL7897. Date of registration: 24 July 2019. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7897.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsQuality of LifeHumansLungMulticenter Studies as TopicNetherlandsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicclinical trialsepidemiologyoncology

Identifiers

PMID34518276
PMCPMC8438957
OpenAlexW3199980997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.