Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34518153›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Acceptability of a Brief Web-Based Theory-Based Intervention to Prevent and Reduce Self-harm: Mixed Methods Evaluation.

Chris Keyworth, Rory O'Connor, Leah Quinlivan, Christopher J Armitage

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05368701 (Randomised Controlled Trial of a Smartphone-based App to Reduce Self-harm for CAMHS-treated Adolescents), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05368701 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Randomised Controlled Trial of a Smartphone-based App to Reduce Self-harm for CAMHS-treated Adolescents

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManchesterRan2022 to 2023Enrolled90ConditionsSelf-harmArmsVolitional Help Sheet for self-harm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chris KeyworthSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7815-6174
Rory O'ConnorSuicidal Behaviour Research Laboratory, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3650-4994
Leah QuinlivanNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3944-3613
Christopher J ArmitageNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2365-1765
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe volitional help sheet (VHS) for self-harm equips people with a means of responding automatically to triggers for self-harm with coping strategies. Although there is some evidence of its efficacy, improving acceptability and making the intervention available in a web-based format may be crucial to increasing effectiveness and reach.

objectiveThis study aims to use the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to explore the acceptability of the VHS, examine for whom and under what circumstances this intervention is more or less acceptable, and develop a series of recommendations for how the VHS can be used to support people in reducing repeat self-harm.

methodsWe explored acceptability in two phases. First, our patient and public involvement partners evaluated the original VHS from a lived experience perspective, which was subsequently translated into a web-based format. Second, a representative sample of adults in the United Kingdom who had previously self-harmed were recruited via a YouGov survey (N=514) and were asked to rate the acceptability of the VHS based on the seven constructs of the TFA, namely, affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, and self-efficacy. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, one-tailed t tests, and binary logistic regression. A directed content analysis approach was used to analyze qualitative data.

resultsParticipants in the web-based survey rated the VHS as positive (affective attitude; t

conclusionsOur findings show high levels of acceptability among some people who have previously self-harmed, particularly among younger adults, people of White ethnic backgrounds, and people without long-term health conditions. Future research should aim to improve acceptability among older adults, people from minority ethnic groups, and people with long-term health conditions.

Indexed as

Self-Injurious BehaviorAgedHumansInternetSelf EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomacceptabilitydigital healthimplementation intentionsmental healthonlineself-harmvolitional help sheet

Identifiers

PMID34518153
PMCPMC8479604
OpenAlexW3190272357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.