Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34517847›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

"We don't want to sedate him" - A qualitative interview study on intentions when administering sedative drugs at the end of life in nursing homes and hospitals.

Sophie Meesters, Bettina Grüne, Claudia Bausewein, Eva Schildmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sedatives and Sedation at the End of Life in the Hospital.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sophie MeestersDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Sophie.meesters@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Bettina GrüneDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Claudia BauseweinDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Eva SchildmannDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious data indicate major differences between countries and settings regarding the intention when administering sedative drugs at the end of life and the perception, which drugs are sedating. Therefore, we aimed to explore the concept of 'sedative drugs' and the intentions of German healthcare professionals in general palliative care when administering sedative drugs at the end of life.

methodsSemi-structured qualitative interviews with physicians and nurses (n = 49). Recruitment took place via contact persons in five hospital departments (haematology/oncology (n = 2), neurology, geriatrics, gynaecology) and five nursing homes. We thematically analysed the transcripts by the Framework approach, using MAXQDA version 2018.2.

resultsMost interviewees referred to benzodiazepines, opioids, and antipsychotics. Some subsumed all into sedative drugs, others differentiated between sedative drugs, anxiolytics, and analgesics. In explaining their intention, interviewees particularly emphasized what they want to avoid when administering sedative drugs. We identified three main themes regarding (excluded) intentions: (1) use of sedative drugs to relieve the patient's suffering with reduction of consciousness as side effect, (2) use of sedative drugs to relieve the situation for the team and/or the family, (3) distinction between intention and expectation regarding hastening death. Interviewees often equated the term 'sedation' with inducing a state of unconsciousness, which should be avoided.

conclusionGerman healthcare professionals in general palliative care seem to negatively connote the term 'sedation'. Moreover, they see themselves in a more passive role by accepting a side effect rather than performing an intentional act. Critical reflection of indications and intentions in accordance with respective guidelines is needed.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsTerminal CareDeathHospitalsHumansHypnotics and SedativesIntentionMaleNursing HomesPalliative CareQualitative ResearchHypnotics and SedativesPharmaceutical PreparationsHospitals; Nursing homes; Palliative Care; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Opioid; Intention; Qualitative research; Deep sedation

Identifiers

PMID34517847
PMCPMC8439055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.