Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34517841›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2021

Neuromuscular block in patients 80 years and older: a prospective, controlled study.

Denis Schmartz, Raouf Sghaier, Paul Bernard, Jean François Fils, Thomas Fuchs-Buder

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03551652 (Evaluation of Duration of Curarisation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03551652 unknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of Duration of Curarisation (Surgical Efficacy) and Pharmacokinetics of Neuromuscular Block After a Single Dose of Rocuronium in Geriatric Patients (Age ≥ 80 Years ) Compared to a Younger Population (Age < 50 Years).

TypeobservationalSponsorCentral Hospital, Nancy, FranceRan2020 to 2021Enrolled28ConditionsNeuromuscular BlockadeArmsPharmacokinetics of rocuronium induced neuromuscular block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Age-Specific Pharmacology of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents: A Comprehensive Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Denis SchmartzCHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 4 Place Van Gehuchten, 1020, Bruxelles, Belgium. Denis.Schmartz@chu-brugmann.be.
Raouf SghaierCHRU de Nancy, Rue du Morvan, 54511, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Paul BernardCHRU de Nancy, Rue du Morvan, 54511, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Jean François FilsArs Statistica, Boulevard des Archers 40, 1400, Nivelles, Belgium.
Thomas Fuchs-BuderCHRU de Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Rue du Morvan, 54511, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increasing number of patients older than 80 years are undergoing anesthesia, but little information is available regarding pharmacodynamic effects of myorelaxants in this population. This study aims to compare the time course of rocuronium neuromuscular block in patients ≥ 80 years with those of younger adults.

methodsUnder total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and sufentanil, time course of a bolus of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg neuromuscular block was assessed with acceleromyography in patients ≥ 80 and in patients 20-50 years old. Onset time, clinical duration, duration until 90% and 100% recovery of baseline were determined.

resultsData from 32 patients were analyzed, 16 were ≥ 80 years and 16 were 20-50 years old. Demographic data are shown in Table 1. In the group ≥ 80, onset time was 190 s ± 46 s compared to 123 s ± 40 s in the group 20-50, P < 0.001 and the clinical duration was 52 [48-69.5] min and 36 [34-41] min, respectively, P < 0.001. Duration to 90% recovery of baseline was 77.5 [71-88.5] min and duration to 100% recovery of baseline was 91.2 [82.2-98] min in patients ≥ 80 years and the corresponding values in the patients 20-50 years old were 53.5 [49-55.5] min and 59.5 [56.5-70.25] min, respectively, P < 0.001.

conclusionCompared to younger adults rocuronium shifted in patients ≥ 80 years from a rapid onset, intermediate acting compound to a slower onset, long-acting compound.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03551652 (29/05/2018).

Indexed as

AdultAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleNeuromuscular BlockadeNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsProspective StudiesRocuroniumTimeNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsRocuroniumAccelerometryGeriatric patientsNeuromuscular blocking agentsNeuromuscular monitoring

Identifiers

PMID34517841
PMCPMC8436544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.