SynthesisCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2021
Characteristics and Quality of National Cardiac Registries: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using natural language processing to extract information from clinical text in electronic medical records for populating clinical registries: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Pooled it
- Data standards for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart).European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2023Pooled it
- Quality and Utility of European Cardiovascular and Orthopaedic Registries for the Regulatory Evaluation of Medical Device Safety and Performance Across the Implant Lifecycle: A Systematic Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2023Pooled it
- A scoping review on the characteristics of chronic pain registries.Pain reports · 2026Review
- Race and Ethnicity in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction for Multiethnic Populations: Insights From Global Guidelines.JACC. Asia · 2026Review
- Systematic review of cardiovascular care delivery across health systems in the Asia-Pacific: a regional roadmap for strengthening cardiovascular care.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Cardiac surgery in Chile: preoperative risk characterization and analytical outcomes pre-operative risk characterization in cardiac surgeries.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Emerging Pharmacological Strategies for Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Qualitative Analysis of Interventional Clinical Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.Gov.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Temporal trends in acute coronary syndrome among women and association with socioeconomic factors-evidence from a middle-income country.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Building Real-World Evidence Infrastructure to Improve Health and Healthcare in the United States: Part I-Coordinated Registry Networks and Systemic Coordinated Inter-Organizational Networks.International journal of translational medical research and public health · 2025Article
- Web-Based Platform for the Chilean Cardiac Surgery Registry: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.JMIR cardio · 2025Article
- Establishing a cardiology registry: navigating quality and regulatory challenges with a focus on congenital heart disease.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Review
- Observational
- Designing a Software for Registry of Pregnant Women with Heart Disease in Iran and Preliminary Results.Journal of medical signals and sensors · 2025Article
- Building national patient registries in Mexico: insights from the MexOMICS Consortium.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Determinants of survival in patients with chronic heart failure: a population-based study in Reggio Emilia, Italy.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- The Most Popular Commercial Weight Management Apps in the Chinese App Store: Analysis of Quality, Features, and Behavior Change Techniques.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Article
- Is the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) excessive in post-angioplasty in chronic coronary syndrome? Data from the France-PCI registry (2014-2019).Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Cardiac Registries During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned.Current cardiology reports · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNational cardiac registries are increasingly used for informing health policy, improving the quality and cost-effectiveness of patient care, clinical research, and monitoring the safety of novel treatments. However, the quality of registries is variable. We aimed to assess the characteristics and quality of national cardiac registries across all subspecialties of cardiac care.
methodsPublications relating to national cardiac registries across six cardiac subspecialty domains were identified by searching MEDLINE and the Google advanced search function with 26 438 citations and 4812 full-text articles reviewed.
resultsA total of 155 registries, representing 49 countries, were included in the study. Of these, 45 related to coronary disease or percutaneous coronary intervention, 28 related to devices, arrhythmia, and electrophysiology, 24 related to heart failure, transplant, and mechanical support, 21 related to structural heart disease, 21 related to congenital heart disease, and 16 related to cardiac surgery. Enrollment was procedure-based in 60% and disease-based in 40%. A total of 73.10 million patients were estimated to have been enrolled in cardiac registries. Quality scoring was performed using a validated registry grading system, with registries performing best in the use of explicit variable definitions and worst in assessment of data reliability. Higher quality scores were associated with government funding, mandated enrollment, linkage to other registries, and outcome risk adjustment. Quality scores and number of registries within a country were positively correlated with each other and with measures of national economic output, health expenditure, and urbanization.
conclusionsThere has been remarkable growth in the uptake of national cardiac registries across the last few decades. However, the quality of processes used to ensure data completeness and accuracy remain variable and few countries have integrated registries covering multiple subspecialty domains. Clinicians, funders, and health policymakers should be encouraged to focus on the range, quality, and integration of these registries. Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero; Unique identifier: CRD42020204224.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.