Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34517724›Full record

SynthesisCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2021

Characteristics and Quality of National Cardiac Registries: A Systematic Review.

Luke P Dawson, Sinjini Biswas, Jeffrey Lefkovits, Dion Stub, Luke Burchill, Sue M Evans, Christopher Reid, David Eccleston

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Luke P DawsonDepartment of Cardiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., J.L., L.B., D.E.).ORCID 0000-0003-3789-5808
Sinjini BiswasDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., S.B., J.L., D.S., S.M.E., C.R.).
Jeffrey LefkovitsDepartment of Cardiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., J.L., L.B., D.E.).
Dion StubDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., S.B., J.L., D.S., S.M.E., C.R.).
Luke BurchillDepartment of Cardiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., J.L., L.B., D.E.).
Sue M EvansDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., S.B., J.L., D.S., S.M.E., C.R.).
Christopher ReidDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., S.B., J.L., D.S., S.M.E., C.R.).ORCID 0000-0001-9173-3944
David EcclestonDepartment of Cardiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., J.L., L.B., D.E.).
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUMonash University · AUBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AUCurtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational cardiac registries are increasingly used for informing health policy, improving the quality and cost-effectiveness of patient care, clinical research, and monitoring the safety of novel treatments. However, the quality of registries is variable. We aimed to assess the characteristics and quality of national cardiac registries across all subspecialties of cardiac care.

methodsPublications relating to national cardiac registries across six cardiac subspecialty domains were identified by searching MEDLINE and the Google advanced search function with 26 438 citations and 4812 full-text articles reviewed.

resultsA total of 155 registries, representing 49 countries, were included in the study. Of these, 45 related to coronary disease or percutaneous coronary intervention, 28 related to devices, arrhythmia, and electrophysiology, 24 related to heart failure, transplant, and mechanical support, 21 related to structural heart disease, 21 related to congenital heart disease, and 16 related to cardiac surgery. Enrollment was procedure-based in 60% and disease-based in 40%. A total of 73.10 million patients were estimated to have been enrolled in cardiac registries. Quality scoring was performed using a validated registry grading system, with registries performing best in the use of explicit variable definitions and worst in assessment of data reliability. Higher quality scores were associated with government funding, mandated enrollment, linkage to other registries, and outcome risk adjustment. Quality scores and number of registries within a country were positively correlated with each other and with measures of national economic output, health expenditure, and urbanization.

conclusionsThere has been remarkable growth in the uptake of national cardiac registries across the last few decades. However, the quality of processes used to ensure data completeness and accuracy remain variable and few countries have integrated registries covering multiple subspecialty domains. Clinicians, funders, and health policymakers should be encouraged to focus on the range, quality, and integration of these registries. Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero; Unique identifier: CRD42020204224.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseHeart FailureCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansRegistriesReproducibility of Resultsatrial fibrillationcoronary artery diseasepercutaneous coronary interventionquality of careregistries

Identifiers

PMID34517724
PMCPMC8452241
OpenAlexW3199394775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.