Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34517692›Full record

ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2021

Stage one endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma: is there a role of traditional hospital follow-up in the detection of cancer recurrence in women after treatment?

Manolis Nikolopoulos, Michelle A L Godfrey, Fareeda Sohrabi, Min Wong, Deepali Bhatte, Rekha Wuntakal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of substantial lymphovascular space invasion on location of first disease recurrence in surgical stage I endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manolis NikolopoulosDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals & NHS Trust, St Helier Hospital, London, UK.
Michelle A L GodfreyDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.
Fareeda SohrabiBarking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals & NHS Trust, Queen's Hospital, London, UK.
Min WongBarking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals & NHS Trust, Queen's Hospital, London, UK.
Deepali BhatteBarking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals & NHS Trust, Queen's Hospital, London, UK.
Rekha WuntakalBarking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals & NHS Trust, Queen's Hospital, London, UK.
Barking, Havering And Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBQueen Alexandra Hospital · GBSt Helier Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the rate of asymptomatic recurrence of stage 1 endometrioid endometrial cancer and assess the role of routine hospital follow-up after treatment.

methodsWe performed a retrospective case-note review study of women who were diagnosed with stage 1 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma at Queen's Hospital, Romford, between January 2008 and December 2016.

resultsWe included 299 patients with a median follow-up period of 44.4 months. All the patients underwent total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Adjuvant radiotherapy was offered to the patients subsequent to discussions in the multidisciplinary team meeting in accordance with the risk stratification criteria. There was no significant correlation between the risk factors and disease recurrence. In total, 11 patients presented with recurrent disease with original staging: 1a, n=6/199; and 1b, n=5/100. Four patients presented with vaginal bleeding due to vault recurrence and one patient with abdominal pain due to pelvic mass. Locoregional recurrence was an incidental finding in two other patients. Four patients presented with symptomatic distant metastases to the lung (n=2), liver (n=1), and bone (n=1). No asymptomatic recurrences were identified on routine follow-ups, despite several hospital appointments and clinical examinations. The recurrence rate for patients with stage 1a and 1b, grade 1, and grade 2 disease was 3.53%, and that for patients with stage 1a, grade 1, and grade 2 disease was 2.7%.

conclusionRoutine clinical examinations have a low yield in finding recurrence in asymptomatic women and should be questioned for their value, considering the limited resources of the National Health Service (NHS). Larger studies are required to support a stratified follow-up, which will include telephone and patient-initiated follow-up.

Indexed as

Endometrial cancerGynecologyPhysical examinationRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID34517692
PMCPMC8595042
OpenAlexW3201350606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.