Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34517035›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2021

Predictive processing models and affective neuroscience.

Kent M Lee, Fernando Ferreira-Santos, Ajay B Satpute

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Neural Predictors of Fear Depend on the Situation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. The neurobiology of interoception and affect.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. The Human Affectome.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Racism as a Source of Pain.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023
    Review
  19. An Adaptive Motivation Approach to Understanding the 'How' and 'Why' of Wellbeing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kent M LeeNortheastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, 125 NI, Boston, MA 02118, USA. Electronic address: ke.lee@northeastern.edu.
Fernando Ferreira-SantosLaboratory of Neuropsychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal.
Ajay B SatputeNortheastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, 125 NI, Boston, MA 02118, USA.

Funding

Advancing understanding of neural representations of threat perception through a novel predictive coding frameworkF32MH122062 · NIMH · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, KENT M · 2020 to 2022
$201k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH122062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural bases of affective experience remain elusive. Early neuroscience models of affect searched for specific brain regions that uniquely carried out the computations that underlie dimensions of valence and arousal. However, a growing body of work has failed to identify these circuits. Research turned to multivariate analyses, but these strategies, too, have made limited progress. Predictive processing models offer exciting new directions to address this problem. Here, we use predictive processing models as a lens to critique prevailing functional neuroimaging research practices in affective neuroscience. Our review highlights how much work relies on rigid assumptions that are inconsistent with a predictive processing approach. We outline the central aspects of a predictive processing model and draw out their implications for research in affective and cognitive neuroscience. Predictive models motivate a reformulation of "reverse inference" in cognitive neuroscience, and placing a greater emphasis on external validity in experimental design.

Indexed as

Cognitive NeuroscienceNeurosciencesArousalBrainEmotionsHumansArousalDegeneracyEcological validityEmotionExperimental designExternal validityfMRMVPAPredictive codingPredictive processingReverse inferenceSubjective experienceValence

Identifiers

PMID34517035
PMCPMC9074371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.