Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34517025›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biological macromolecules2021

Genomics-guided targeting of stress granule proteins G3BP1/2 to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 propagation.

Nemat Ali, Kartikay Prasad, Abdullah F AlAsmari, Metab Alharbi, Summya Rashid, Vijay Kumar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biological macromolecules, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. ALKBH5-Mediated MAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Role(s) of G3BPs in Human Pathogenesis.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nemat AliDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Kartikay PrasadAmity Institute of Neuropsychology & Neurosciences, Amity University, Noida, UP 201303, India.
Abdullah F AlAsmariDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Metab AlharbiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Summya RashidDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmacy Girls Section, Prince Sattam Bin AbdulAziz University, Al kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Vijay KumarAmity Institute of Neuropsychology & Neurosciences, Amity University, Noida, UP 201303, India. Electronic address: vkumar33@amity.edu.
King Saud University · SAAmity University · INPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein undergoes RNA-induced phase separation (LLPS) and sequesters the host key stress granule (SG) proteins, Ras-GTPase-activating protein SH3-domain-binding protein 1 and 2 (G3BP1 and G3BP2) to inhibit SG formation. This will allow viral packaging and propagation in host cells. Based on a genomic-guided meta-analysis, here we identify upstream regulatory elements modulating the expression of G3BP1 and G3BP2 (collectively called G3BP1/2). Using this strategy, we have identified FOXA1, YY1, SYK, E2F-1, and TGFBR2 as activators and SIN3A, SRF, and AKT-1 as repressors of G3BP1/2 genes. Panels of the activators and repressors were then used to identify drugs that change their gene expression signatures. Two drugs, imatinib, and decitabine have been identified as putative modulators of G3BP1/2 genes and their regulators, suggesting their role as COVID-19 mitigation agents. Molecular docking analysis suggests that both drugs bind to G3BP1/2 with a much higher affinity than the SARS-CoV-2 N protein. This study reports imatinib and decitabine as candidate drugs against N protein and G3BP1/2 protein.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCoronavirus Nucleocapsid ProteinsCOVID-19DecitabineDNA HelicasesDrug Delivery SystemsGenomicsImatinib MesylatePhosphoproteinsPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA HelicasesRNA Recognition Motif ProteinsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCoronavirus Nucleocapsid ProteinsDecitabineDNA HelicasesG3BP1 protein, humanG3BP2 protein, humanImatinib Mesylatenucleocapsid phosphoprotein, SARS-CoV-2PhosphoproteinsPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA HelicasesRNA Recognition Motif ProteinsDecitabineG3BP1/2Gene set enrichmentImatinibNucleocapsid proteinSARS-CoV-2Stress granule

Identifiers

PMID34517025
PMCPMC8431879
OpenAlexW3199276639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.