Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34516976›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research2022

Passive sampling, a practical method for wastewater-based surveillance of SARS-CoV-2.

Jemaneh Habtewold, David McCarthy, Edward McBean, Ilya Law, Larry Goodridge, Marc Habash, Heather M Murphy

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Agile, on-demand wastewater surveillance of virus infections to support pandemic and outbreak response in Rotterdam-Rijnmond, the Netherlands, 2020 to 2022.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Diurnal changes in pathogenic and indicator virus concentrations in wastewater.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jemaneh HabtewoldWater, Health and Applied Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
David McCarthyEnvironmental and Public Health Microbiology Laboratory (EPHM Lab), Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Australia.
Edward McBeanSchool of Engineering, University of Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Ilya LawWater, Health and Applied Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Larry GoodridgeDepartment of Food Science, University of Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Marc HabashSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Heather M MurphyWater, Health and Applied Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada. Electronic address: heather.murphy@uoguelph.ca.
University of Guelph · CAMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In search of practical and affordable tools for wastewater-based surveillance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), three independent field experiments were conducted using three passive sampler sorbents (electronegative membrane, cotton bud, and gauze) in Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Total daily cases during this study ranged from 2 to 17/100,000 people and 43/54 traditionally collected wastewater samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 with mean detectable concentrations ranging from 8.4 to 1780 copies/ml. Viral levels on the passive samplers were assessed after 4, 8, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hrs of deployment in the wastewater and 43/54 membrane, 42/54 gauze, and 27/54 cotton bud samples were positive. A linear accumulation rate of SARS-CoV-2 on the membranes was observed up to 48 hours, suggesting the passive sampler could adequately reflect wastewater levels for up to two days of deployment. Due the variability in accumulation observed for the cotton buds and gauzes, and the pre-processing steps required for the gauzes, we recommend membrane filters as a simple cost-effective option for wastewater-based surveillance of SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HumansOntarioWastewaterWastewaterCOVID-19Passive samplersRT-qPCRSARS-CoV-2wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE)Wastewater surveillance

Identifiers

PMID34516976
PMCPMC8433097
OpenAlexW3199427071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.