Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34516551›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Prenatal care providers' perceptions of the SARS-Cov-2 vaccine for themselves and for pregnant women.

Philippe Deruelle, Camile Couffignal, Jeanne Sibiude, Alexandre J Vivanti, Olivia Anselem, Dominique Luton, Alexandra Benachi, Laurent Mandelbrot, Christelle Vauloup-Fellous, Anne Gael Cordier and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Understanding Primary Care Physician Vaccination Behaviour: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Healthcare Providers During the First 10 Months of Vaccine Availability: Scoping Review.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Covid-19 vaccination in pregnancy.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022
    Review
  11. COVID-19 vaccine uptake and intention during pregnancy in Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Philippe DeruellePôle de gynécologie Obstétrique, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4273-6553
Camile CouffignalClinical Research, Biostatistics and Epidemiology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France.
Jeanne SibiudeGroupe de Recherche sur les Infections pendant la Grossesse (GRIG), Vélizy, France.
Alexandre J VivantiGroupe de Recherche sur les Infections pendant la Grossesse (GRIG), Vélizy, France.
Olivia AnselemGroupe de Recherche sur les Infections pendant la Grossesse (GRIG), Vélizy, France.
Dominique LutonGroupe de Recherche sur les Infections pendant la Grossesse (GRIG), Vélizy, France.
Alexandra BenachiGroupe de Recherche sur les Infections pendant la Grossesse (GRIG), Vélizy, France.
Laurent MandelbrotGroupe de Recherche sur les Infections pendant la Grossesse (GRIG), Vélizy, France.
Christelle Vauloup-FellousGroupe de Recherche sur les Infections pendant la Grossesse (GRIG), Vélizy, France.
Anne Gael CordierGroupe de Recherche sur les Infections pendant la Grossesse (GRIG), Vélizy, France.
Olivier PiconeGroupe de Recherche sur les Infections pendant la Grossesse (GRIG), Vélizy, France.
Inserm · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrenatal care providers will play an important role in the acceptance of SARS-Cov-2 vaccination for pregnant women.

objectiveTo determine the perceptions of French prenatal care providers: midwives, general practitioners (GPs) and obstetricians and gynaecologists (Ob-Gyn) regarding SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during pregnancy. STUDY

designAn anonymous online survey was sent to members of French professional societies representing prenatal practitioners. The participants were asked to answer questions on their characteristics and give their opinions of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for themselves and women who are pregnant or willing to become pregnant.

resultsAccess to the survey was opened from January 11th, 2021, to March 1st, 2021. A total of 1,416 responses were collected from 749 Ob-Gyn, 598 midwives and 69 GPs. Most respondents (86.7% overall, 90.4% for Ob-GYN, 81.1% for GPs and 80.1% for midwives) agreed to receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 would be offered to pregnant women by 49.4% 95%CI [48.1-50.8] of the participants. Midwives were less likely to recommend vaccination than GP and Ob-Gyn (37.5%, 50.7% and 58.8%, respectively). The multinomial logistic regression revealed that being an obstetrician, working in a group, usually offering a flu vaccine and wanting to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 were positively associated with considering pregnant women for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

conclusionMost French prenatal healthcare providers are favourable towards vaccinating pregnant women, but a large minority express reservation. More evidence on safety and involvement by professional organisations will be important to encourage the access of pregnant women to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMaternal Health ServicesAdultCOVID-19FemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysician's RolePregnancyPregnant PeopleSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationVaccination Refusal

Identifiers

PMID34516551
PMCPMC8437278
OpenAlexW3200558159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.