ArticlePLoS computational biology2021
A statistical model for describing and simulating microbial community profiles.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Proportionality-based association metrics in count compositional data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Coenocline Simulation of Microbiome Samples: A Biologically Mechanistic Framework for Generating Ecologically Realistic Synthetic Datasets to Support Classification Method Evaluation.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Joint-RPCA: domain-aware multi-omics integration for systems microbiology.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- Prevalence aware feature selection improves biomarker identification in microbiome studies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- DTH: a nonparametric test for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Multidimensional scaling informed by F-statistic: Visualizing grouped microbiome data with inference.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Scale reliant mixed effects models enhance microbiome data analysis.Microbiome · 2026Article
- MaAsLin 3: refining and extending generalized multivariable linear models for meta-omic association discovery.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Joint modeling of longitudinal biomarker and survival outcomes with the presence of competing risk in the nested case-control studies with application to the TEDDY microbiome dataset.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Design, processing, and modeling for longitudinal multiomics microbiome data.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- N2SIMBA: from Network topology to SIMulation of interactions and BActerial abundance, using microbial consumer resource model.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- DeepIMB: Imputation of non-biological zero counts in microbiome data.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
- metadeconfoundR: Covariate analysis of high-dimensional cross-sectional omics data.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Microbiome data integration via shared dictionary learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Replacing normalizations with interval assumptions enhances differential expression and differential abundance analyses.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Incorporating scale uncertainty in microbiome and gene expression analysis as an extension of normalization.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Processing-bias correction with DEBIAS-M improves cross-study generalization of microbiome-based prediction models.Nature microbiology · 2025Article
- Quantifying Metagenomic Strain Associations from Microbiomes with Anpan.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Shotgun Metagenomics RevealsGastro hep advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many methods have been developed for statistical analysis of microbial community profiles, but due to the complex nature of typical microbiome measurements (e.g. sparsity, zero-inflation, non-independence, and compositionality) and of the associated underlying biology, it is difficult to compare or evaluate such methods within a single systematic framework. To address this challenge, we developed SparseDOSSA (Sparse Data Observations for the Simulation of Synthetic Abundances): a statistical model of microbial ecological population structure, which can be used to parameterize real-world microbial community profiles and to simulate new, realistic profiles of known structure for methods evaluation. Specifically, SparseDOSSA's model captures marginal microbial feature abundances as a zero-inflated log-normal distribution, with additional model components for absolute cell counts and the sequence read generation process, microbe-microbe, and microbe-environment interactions. Together, these allow fully known covariance structure between synthetic features (i.e. "taxa") or between features and "phenotypes" to be simulated for method benchmarking. Here, we demonstrate SparseDOSSA's performance for 1) accurately modeling human-associated microbial population profiles; 2) generating synthetic communities with controlled population and ecological structures; 3) spiking-in true positive synthetic associations to benchmark analysis methods; and 4) recapitulating an end-to-end mouse microbiome feeding experiment. Together, these represent the most common analysis types in assessment of real microbial community environmental and epidemiological statistics, thus demonstrating SparseDOSSA's utility as a general-purpose aid for modeling communities and evaluating quantitative methods. An open-source implementation is available at http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/sparsedossa2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.