The status

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Isolation, Molecular Characterization and In Vitro Propagation of anPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Article
2. IDCases · 2025
   Article
3. Lyme borreliosis in Brazil: a critical review on the Baggio-Yoshinari syndrome (Brazilian Lyme-like disease).Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
   Review
4. On validly published names, correct names, and changes in the nomenclature of phyla and genera of prokaryotes: a guide for the perplexed.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024
   Article
5. Request for public discussion and ballot to amend SeqCode rules on priority of Candidatus names and correction of typographic and orthographic errors.ISME communications · 2023
   Review
6. Collection and curation of prokaryotic genome assemblies from type strains at NCBI.International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2023
   Article
7. How, not if, is the question mycologists should be asking about DNA-based typification.MycoKeys · 2023
   Article
8. Development of the SeqCode: A proposed nomenclatural code for uncultivated prokaryotes with DNA sequences as type.Systematic and applied microbiology · 2022
   Review
9. ICSP response to 'Science depends on nomenclature, but nomenclature is not science'.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022
   Article
10. It is time for a new type of type to facilitate naming the microbial world.New microbes and new infections
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as