Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34516323›Full record

ReviewInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2022

Aortic arch anomalies, embryology and their relevance in neuro-interventional surgery and stroke: A review.

Shilpa S Mantri, Bharath Raju, Fareed Jumah, Michael S Rallo, Anmol Nagaraj, Priyank Khandelwal, Sudipta Roychowdhury, David Kung, Anil Nanda, Gaurav Gupta

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shilpa S MantriDepartment of Neurosurgery, 43982Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School & University Hospital, USA.
Bharath RajuDepartment of Neurosurgery, 43982Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School & University Hospital, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4897-2939
Fareed JumahDepartment of Neurosurgery, 43982Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School & University Hospital, USA.
Michael S RalloDepartment of Neurosurgery, 43982Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School & University Hospital, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8370-3486
Anmol NagarajDepartment of Neurosurgery, 43982Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School & University Hospital, USA.
Priyank KhandelwalDepartment of Neurosurgery, 242612New Jersey Medical School & University Hospital, USA.
Sudipta RoychowdhuryDepartment of Neuroradiology, 12287 Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School & University Hospital, USA.
David KungDepartment of Neurosurgery, 242612New Jersey Medical School & University Hospital, USA.
Anil NandaDepartment of Neurosurgery, 43982Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School & University Hospital, USA.
Gaurav GuptaDepartment of Neurosurgery, 43982Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School & University Hospital, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity Hospital, Newark · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCongenital aortic arch anomalies are commonly encountered during neurointerventional procedures. While some anomalies are identified at an early age, many are incidentally discovered later in adulthood during endovascular evaluations or interventions. Proper understanding of the normal arch anatomy and its variants is pivotal to safely navigate normal aortic arch branches and to negotiate the catheter through anomalies during neurointerventional procedures. This is particularly relevant in the increasingly "transradial first" culture of neurointerventional surgery. Moreover, some of these anomalies have a peculiar predilection for complications including aneurysm formation, dissection, and rupture during the procedure. Therefore, an understanding of these anomalies, their underlying embryological basis and associations, and pattern of circulation will help endovascular neurosurgeons and interventional radiologists navigate with confidence and consider relevant pathologic associations that may inform risk of cerebrovascular disease.

methodsHere, we present a brief review of the basic embryology of the common anomalies of the aortic arch along with their neurological significances and discuss, through illustrative cases, the association of aortic arch anomalies with cerebral vascular pathology.

conclusionsUnderstanding the aortic arch anomalies and its embryological basis is essential to safely navigate the cerebral vascular system during neurointerventional surgeries.

Indexed as

AneurysmStrokeAdultAorta, ThoracicHumansSubclavian Arteryaberrant subclavian arteryaneurysmAortic archcoarctation of aortaembryologysteal phenomenonstrokevertebral artery anomalies

Identifiers

PMID34516323
PMCPMC9326868
OpenAlexW3199782692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.