Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34516319›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2022

O

Federico Bruno, Nicola Carboni, Pierpaolo Palumbo, Francesco Arrigoni, Marco Varrassi, Antonio Izzo, Nadia Catallo, Ernesto Di Cesare, Carlo Masciocchi, Alessandra Splendiani and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MR-guided spine interventions: time to get off the ground?Annals of translational medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Federico BrunoDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, 87968University of L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1444-2585
Nicola CarboniDepartment of Radiologic Sciences, 9294Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Italy.
Pierpaolo PalumboDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, 87968University of L'Aquila, Italy.
Francesco ArrigoniDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, 87968University of L'Aquila, Italy.
Marco VarrassiDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, 87968University of L'Aquila, Italy.
Antonio IzzoDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, 87968University of L'Aquila, Italy.
Nadia CatalloDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, 87968University of L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6807-3298
Ernesto Di CesareDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, 87968University of L'Aquila, Italy.
Carlo MasciocchiDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, 87968University of L'Aquila, Italy.
Alessandra SplendianiDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, 87968University of L'Aquila, Italy.
Andrea GiovagnoniDepartment of Radiologic Sciences, 9294Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Italy.
Antonio BarileDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, 87968University of L'Aquila, Italy.
University of L'Aquila · ITMarche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo retrospectively evaluate the clinical and instrumental outcome of different treatment sessions of oxygen-ozone (O

methodsWe evaluated 73 patients partially responders to a single session of oxygen-ozone (O

resultsBased on the type and number of treatments performed, patients were divided into three groups: Group A) patients submitted to an additional periradicular anaesthetic/steroid injection; Group B) patients submitted to an additional session of intradiscal O

conclusionsIn our retrospective observation of partially responder patients, multiple intradiscal ozone injections were not associated with a higher disc shrinkage nor superior clinical outcome compared to a single intradiscal O

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc ChemolysisIntervertebral Disc DisplacementOzoneHumansLumbar VertebraeOxygenRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeOxygenOzoneCT guidancedisc herniationlumbar spineMRIOzone chemodiscolysis

Identifiers

PMID34516319
PMCPMC9326869
OpenAlexW2790246045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.