ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2021
Consensus Guidelines for the Assessments of Individuals Who Stutter Across the Lifespan.
Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interdisciplinary collaboration and clinical management for Norwegian preschool children who stutter: 'Who, what, when, and where?'Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Addressing Stuttering Variability in Assessment and Treatment: Perspectives of Speech-Language Pathologists.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026Article
- How Variability Is Addressed in Interventions for Neurodiverse Conditions: Implications for Stuttering.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Listener Ratings of Stuttering: Evaluating Two Auditory-Perceptual Scales.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Predicting the impact of stuttering in the school years.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Investigating perspective taking and caregiver-proxy-child communication attitude agreement in early childhood stuttering.PloS one · 2026Article
- Variability of Stuttering in Young Children: Caregivers' Perceptions and Experiences.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025Article
- Caregiver Predictions of Their 3- to 6-Year-Old Child Who Stutters' Communication Attitude.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
- Delphi Survey of Items for the Test of Stuttering Screening in Children (TSSC).Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2023Article
- Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Likert-Type Stuttering Severity Scale and the Visual Analog Scale in Turkish-Speaking Adults Who Stutter.International journal of language & communication disordersObservational
- Linguistic aspects of stuttering: research updates on the language-fluency interface.Topics in language disordersArticle
- Understanding the Perspectives of School Children Who Stutter: A Rapid Review.International journal of language & communication disordersReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose This project sought to develop consensus guidelines for clinically meaningful, comprehensive assessment procedures for people who stutter across the lifespan. Method Twelve expert clinicians and researchers who have written extensively about stuttering provided detailed descriptions of the type of data that they routinely collect during diagnostic evaluations of preschool children, school-age children, adolescents, and adults who stutter. Iterative content analysis, with repeated input from the respondents, was used to identify core areas that reflect common domains that these experts judge to be important for evaluating stuttering for varying age groups. Results Six core areas were identified as common components of a comprehensive evaluation of stuttering and people who stutter. These areas should be included to varying degrees depending upon the age and needs of the client or family. The core areas include the following: (a) stuttering-related background information; (b) speech, language, and temperament development (especially for younger clients); (c) speech fluency and stuttering behaviors; (d) reactions to stuttering by the speaker; (e) reactions to stuttering by people in the speaker's environment; and (f) adverse impact caused by stuttering. Discussion These consensus recommendations can help speech-language pathologists who are uncertain about appropriate stuttering assessment procedures to design and conduct more thorough evaluations, so that they will be better prepared to provide individualized and comprehensive treatment for people who stutter across the lifespan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.