ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2022
Effects of thoracic sympathetic stimulation on palmar perfusion: a preliminary study in pigs.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAblation of the upper thoracic sympathetic ganglia that innervates the hands is the most effective and permanent cure of palmar hyperhidrosis. However, this type of sympathectomy causes irreversible neural damage and may result in severe compensatory hyperhidrosis. This experiment is designed to confirm the hypothesis, in which the stimulation of T2 sympathetic chain leads to increased palmar microcirculation, and thus results in treating hyperhidrosis.
methodsIn this study, we used electric stimulation to induce reversible blockade of the sympathetic ganglion in pigs and investigated its effect on palmar perfusion. An electrode was inserted to the T2 sympathetic ganglion of the pig through three different approaches: open dorsal, thoracoscopic, and fluoroscopy-guided approaches. Electric stimulation was delivered through the electrode using clinically available pulse generators. Palmar microcirculation was evaluated by laser speckle contrast imaging.
resultsThe T2 sympathetic ganglion of the pig was successfully accessed by all the three approaches, as confirmed by changes in palmar microcirculation during electric stimulation. Similar effects were not observed when the electrode was placed on the T4 sympathetic ganglion or off the sympathetic trunk.
conclusionWe established a large animal model to verify the effect of thoracic sympathetic stimulation. Electric stimulation can be used for sympathetic blockade, as confirmed by increased blood perfusion of the palm. Our work suggests that sympathetic stimulation is a potential solution for palmar hyperhidrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.