Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34515783›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Surveillance for Colonization, Transmission, and Infection With Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Dennis Nurjadi, Vanessa M Eichel, Patrik Tabatabai, Sabrina Klein, Katharina Last, Nico T Mutters, Johannes Pöschl, Philipp Zanger, Klaus Heeg, Sébastien Boutin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Investigation and control of a meticillin-resistantInfection prevention in practice · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Nasal microbiome inhabitants with anti-Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  16. Retrospective Evaluation of Empiric Vancomycin Therapy for Infectious Workups in Relation to Methicillin-ResistantThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Microbiome dysbiosis: a modifiable state and target to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infections and other diseases in neonates.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Review
  19. Healthcare worker perceptions surroundingInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dennis NurjadiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Vanessa M EichelDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Patrik TabatabaiDepartment of Neonatology, Heidelberg University Children's Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sabrina KleinDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katharina LastDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nico T MuttersDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Johannes PöschlDepartment of Neonatology, Heidelberg University Children's Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Philipp ZangerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Klaus HeegDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sébastien BoutinDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DEHeidelberg University · DEInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Staphylococcus aureus is one of the leading causes of infections in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Most studies in this patient group focus on methicillin-resistant S aureus or the outbreak setting, whereas data for methicillin-susceptible S aureus are limited. Objectives: To identify risk factors for S aureus colonization and infections in hospitalized newborns and to investigate S aureus transmission and its dynamics in a nonoutbreak setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: This monocentric cohort study in a tertiary NICU in Heidelberg, Germany, enrolled all hospitalized neonates (n = 590) with at least 1 nasal screening swab positive for S aureus. Data were collected from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019. Exposures: Weekly screening for S aureus colonization was performed for all newborns until discharge. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was any S aureus infection until hospital discharge. Transmission of S aureus and performance of routine typing to detect transmissions were defined as the secondary outcomes of the study. Results: In total, 590 newborns were enrolled (276 [46.8%] female and 314 [53.2%] male; 220 [37.3%] with birthweight <1500 g; 477 [80.8%] preterm; 449 [76.1%] singletons; 419 [71.5%] delivered via cesarean section). The median length of stay was 26 (range, 10-62) days. Overall, 135 infants (22.9%) were colonized by S aureus at some time during their hospital stay. The median time to first detection was 17 (interquartile range, 11-37) days. The overall incidence of S aureus infection was 1.7% (10 of 590). Low birth weight (<1500 g [odds ratio, 9.3; 95% CI, 5.9-14.6; P < .001]) and longer hospital stay (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.9-2.7; P < .001) were associated with colonization. Nasal carriage was significantly associated with S aureus infection (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% CI, 2.1-32.3; P = .002). A total of 123 of 135 colonization isolates were sequenced. All recoverable infection isolates (4 of 7) of newborns with colonization were genetically identical to the colonizing isolate. Whole-genome sequencing indicated 23 potential transmission clusters. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that nasal colonization is a relevant risk factor for S aureus infection in a nonoutbreak NICU setting. In colonized newborns, infection and colonization isolates were genetically identical, suggesting that eradication of colonization may be a useful measure to prevent infection. Further investigations are necessary to validate and assess the generalizability of our findings.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceBirth WeightCohort StudiesCross InfectionDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLength of StayMaleNasal CavityOdds RatioStaphylococcal Infections

Identifiers

PMID34515783
PMCPMC8438598
OpenAlexW3201602104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.